Here is “Native Negotiations are a Winning Alternative to Courts.”

Here are the materials in Santee Sioux Nation v. Tso (D. Neb.):
3 Brief ISO Motion for Preiminary Injunction

On November 17, 2023, the North Dakota federal district court ruled in favor of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Nation against the North Dakota Secretary of State. The Plaintiffs proved at trial that the North Dakota legislative redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by diluting the voting strength of Native American voters living on and near both reservations. The state has been ordered to submit a VRA compliant redistricting plan to the court by December 22, 2023.
The Order is here:
Previous post on this matter here and PR here.

Breanna K. Bollig has published “Improving Public Schools: What Advocates Can Learn From Indian Education Rights” in the Journal of Law and Education.
An except:
Unbeknownst to most education advocates, though, is that Indian education rights provide critical lessons on how to improve schools and the right to education. Just as tribal nations—as separate sovereigns that are capable of enacting their own laws—are considered “laboratories of legal innovation,” there is massive potential for studying Indian education rights. With its successes and failures, education advocates can look to Indian education rights to better develop a strategy to improve public schools. In fact, education advocates could have much needed guidance in asking vital questions surrounding inadequate and inequitable public schools. For example, how should the states and the federal government share the responsibility of education in the United States? How should a federal right to education be created? How can we better hold inadequate and inequitable schools accountable? What other strategies can we use to improve inadequate and inequitable schools?

Here is the order in National Education Association of New Mexico v. Central Consolidated School District (N.M. Ct. App.):

Here are the materials in Peterson v. Harrah’s NC Casino Company LLC (W.D. N.C.):

Thank you to everyone who participated in the 2023 Indigenous Law Conference!












TICA CHAMPIONS ⚖️
-Cherokee Nation
-Chickasaw Nation
-Fields Han Cunniff PLLC
-Invenio Tribal Law
-Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
-Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Miller & Monkman, LLP
TICA SUPPORTERS 💪🏼
-Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
-Casino Del Sol, Pascua Yaqui Tribe
-Choctaw Nation
-Earthjustice
-Hogen Adams
-Holland & Knight
-Industrial Economics, Incorporated
-Jill Grant & Associates, LLC
-Ocotillo Law & Policy Partners
-Rothstein Donatelli, LLP
-The Circle Law Group, P.C.
-Williamson Creative Agency
PANEL SPONSORS 🌟
-Greetham Law, P.L.L.C.
-Historical Research -Associates, Inc.
-Kutak Rock
-Native American Rights Fund
RECEPTION SPONSORS🌹
-Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker, LLP
-Red Maple Consulting
OTHER SPONSORS 🌅
-Maynes, Bradford, Shipps, Sheftel LLP
-Indigenous Law and Policy Center at MSU Law
-Tribal In-House Counsel Association
Here are the materials in the case captioned California Valley Miwok Tribe v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
37 Motion for Preliminary Injunction

You must be logged in to post a comment.