Here are the materials in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):
149 Mille Lacs Band Motion for Summary J
164 Walsh Motion for Summary J
184 County Motion for Sanctions
Here are the materials in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):
149 Mille Lacs Band Motion for Summary J
164 Walsh Motion for Summary J
184 County Motion for Sanctions
Here.
Here are the merits briefs:
Here are the amicus briefs supporting petitioner:
19-1414 Amicus Brief of NationalIndigenousWomensResourceCenter
19-1414 Indian Law Scholars Cooley Brief
19-1414 tsac Former U.S. Attorneys
19-1414 tsac Members of Congress
19-1414 tsac The Cayuga Nation
Final NCAI-Tribal Governments Amici Brief-US v Cooley 1-15-21
Here are the amicus briefs supporting respondent:
19-1414 Amici Curiae Brief Ninth Circuit Federal Defenders
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Amicus Brief
Here are the cert stage materials:
Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
Here are the Ninth Circuit materials:
Here are the district court (D. Mont.) materials:
From the Traverse City Record-Eagle, here is “STOLEN: Grand Traverse Band seeks its day in court for theft of reservation lands.“

Here are the en banc stage materials in United States v. Abouselman:
Order Denying Petition for Rehearing
Panel materials here.
Here.
By Sheri Freemont
Imagine being a Native American person and being in a court that will judge your family and
parenting where the judge, the lawyers, the social workers, the security guard, the court
reporter, the judicial assistant, are all non-natives? As a native person who is aware of the
history of the nation to condemn Native Americans as parents, and even as humans, how
does it feel? Will native people feel comforted by the explanation that they have due process
rights? Consider: the government cannot take your child away from you without due process.
Does having due process rights mean they will still take your child away, but you get notice
and an opportunity to be heard, and a lawyer to represent you? A lawyer who has never been
inside a native person’s home, who has never heard about boarding schools or Indian massacres, or the hundreds of years of attacking the familial ways of native people. More than plain
language explaining the laws and process is needed to serve these families in child welfare
cases.5 We need to use the gold standard of legal practice, borrowing from what the Indian
Child Welfare Act can teach us about how to do child welfare practice differently.
Here are the new materials in La Posta Band of the Diegueño Mission Indians v. Trump (S.D. Cal.):
40-1 Second Motion for Injunction
Update — 1/7/2021
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.