Federal Court Holds Mille Lacs Ojibwe Has Standing to Sue County over Reservation Boundaries

Here are the materials in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):

149 Mille Lacs Band Motion for Summary J

164 Walsh Motion for Summary J

173 Mille Lacs Band Response

176 Walsh Response

184 County Motion for Sanctions

190 Mille Lacs Band Response to 184

194 Mille Lacs Band Reply

198 Walsh Reply

217 DCT Order

Prior posts here and here.

NYTs: “It’s 2020. Indigenous Team Names in Sports Have to Go.”

Here.

United States v. Cooley Background Materials

Here are the merits briefs:

Petitioner’s Brief

Respondent Brief

Petitioner’s Reply

Here are the amicus briefs supporting petitioner:

19-1414 Amici SiouxTribes

19-1414 Amicus Brief of NationalIndigenousWomensResourceCenter

19-1414 Indian Law Scholars Cooley Brief

19-1414 tsac Former U.S. Attorneys

19-1414 tsac Members of Congress

19-1414 tsac The Cayuga Nation

19-1414 Ute Amici Brief

Final NCAI-Tribal Governments Amici Brief-US v Cooley 1-15-21

Here are the amicus briefs supporting respondent:

19-1414 Amici Curiae Brief Ninth Circuit Federal Defenders

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Amicus Brief

Here are the cert stage materials:

Cert Petition

NCAI Amicus Brief

NIWRC Amicus Brief

Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

Cooley Cert Reply

Here are the Ninth Circuit materials:

Ninth Circuit opinion

US Brief

Cooley Brief

Reply

Here are the district court (D. Mont.) materials:

2 Redacted Indictment

34 Motion to Suppress

34-1 Exhibit

41 Response

41-1 Exhibit

41-2 Exhibit

46 Reply

48 DCT Order Granting Motion to Suppress

Cert Stage Briefs in CARES Act Funding Eligibility Matter [Mnunchin v. Chehalis/ANVC v. Chehalis]

Here:

Mnuchin v Chehalis Cert Petition

Alaska Native Corps Cert Petition

Members of Congress Amicus Brief

State of Alaska Amicus Brief

Chehalis Brief in Opposition

Ute Tribe BIO

Cheyenne River Sioux BIO

ANVCA Reply

Federal Petitioner’s Reply

Lower court materials here.

News Profile on Grand Traverse Band’s Stolen Land

From the Traverse City Record-Eagle, here is “STOLEN: Grand Traverse Band seeks its day in court for theft of reservation lands.

Tenth Circuit Denies En Banc Petition in Pueblo Water Rights Matter

Here are the en banc stage materials in United States v. Abouselman:

En Banc Petition

US Response

Order Denying Petition for Rehearing

Panel materials here.

NYTs: “In Last Rush, Trump Grants Mining and Energy Firms Access to Public Lands”

Here.

Gold Standard Lawyering in The NACC Guardian

Here

By Sheri Freemont

Imagine being a Native American person and being in a court that will judge your family and
parenting where the judge, the lawyers, the social workers, the security guard, the court
reporter, the judicial assistant, are all non-natives? As a native person who is aware of the
history of the nation to condemn Native Americans as parents, and even as humans, how
does it feel? Will native people feel comforted by the explanation that they have due process
rights? Consider: the government cannot take your child away from you without due process.
Does having due process rights mean they will still take your child away, but you get notice
and an opportunity to be heard, and a lawyer to represent you? A lawyer who has never been
inside a native person’s home, who has never heard about boarding schools or Indian massacres, or the hundreds of years of attacking the familial ways of native people. More than plain
language explaining the laws and process is needed to serve these families in child welfare
cases.5 We need to use the gold standard of legal practice, borrowing from what the Indian
Child Welfare Act can teach us about how to do child welfare practice differently.

Federal Court Denies Second Effort by La Posta Band of the Diegueño Mission Indians to Stop Trump Border Wall

Here are the new materials in La Posta Band of the Diegueño Mission Indians v. Trump (S.D. Cal.):

39 Amended Complaint

40-1 Second Motion for Injunction

47 Opposition

55 Reply

60 DCT Order

Update — 1/7/2021

64 Motion for Reconsideration

69 Response

72 DCT Order

Prior posts here, here, and here.