Here is the opinion:
Briefs here.
In a separate order, the Court affirmed Sharp v. Murphy:
Here are the materials in Free Spirit Organics NAC v. San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors (E.D. Cal.):
58 Individual Plaintiffs Opposition
94 Defendants Post-Hearing Brief
In High Country News, here.
Excerpt:
There’s a powerful dog whistle attacking American Indian families and tribes who assert their rights to keep Native children with Native families under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Increasingly, foster and adoptive parents are fighting those families and tribes who seek to reunite with their children by claiming to be “the only family the child has ever known.” It was the racism in the child welfare system against Indian families that initially compelled Congress to establish ICWA in 1978. Now, as America continues to grapple with its racist history and systems of white supremacy, it’s time for courts to see through racist dog whistles and prioritize families of color.
Here is the opinion. The court affirmed the district court’s order to remand the decision back to Fish and Wildlife Service.
Here are the briefs.
Here are the new materials in Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Mnuchin (D.D.C.):
99 Chelahis Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
Prior post here.
Here are the briefs in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County :
Lower court materials here.
ICWA was thereafter applied to the case, but the damage was done — the children were placed in foster care without the normal protections the law would have offered them. Now, the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska are challenging the decision in the Washington State Supreme Court. If the court’s decision is upheld, advocates say the case could significantly weaken the use of ICWA in Washington by raising the bar for what qualifies as a “reason to know” that a child is “Indian” in the eyes of the law.
Kathryn Fort, director of Michigan State’s Indian Law Clinic, who is arguing on behalf of the tribes in the case involving Greer and Graham, says that it shouldn’t be so difficult. The burden of checking in with a tribe is low, she says, but the outcome has immense implications for the family, children and tribe.
Briefing and oral arguments here.
Here is the order in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Northern Plains Resource Council.
Here are the briefs:
US Army Corps Stay Application
Lower court order here.
Here is the opinion in United States v. Many White Horses.
Briefs here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.