Here:
Prior post here.

Here.

Here are the pleadings in United States v. Iski (N.D. Okla.):
And here are the pleadings in United States v. Ballard (N.D. Okla.):

Kirsten Matoy Carlson has published “Justice Beyond the State” in the Alaska Law Review. PDF
Abstract:
For decades the intersectionality of extreme rurality and cultural difference has led scholars and tribal leaders to advocate for recognition of local authority as a solution to the justice gap in rural Alaska. Local control often means developing courts in and extending jurisdiction to Alaska Native villages. This Article evaluates strengthening tribal courts or justice systems through restorations of jurisdiction as a way to address access to justice issues in Alaska Native villages. It argues that restorations of jurisdiction and the development of tribal justice systems must ensure that Alaska Natives define the justice provided in their communities. Restorations of jurisdiction that require Alaska Native villages to replace their traditions and laws with adversarial processes and values threaten to undermine access to justice.

Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig (D.N.D.):
1-8 MHA Nation Supreme Court Decision
8 Fettig Answer + Counterclaim
13 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim
Prior post here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.