Here is the order in United States v. Jefferson (W.D. Wash.):

Here are the new materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding 19-01:
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding no. 19-01:
1-motion-for-leave-to-file.pdf
3-request-for-determination.pdf
8-swinomish-motion-for-tro.pdf
13-upper-skagit-motion-for-tro.pdf
Here are the materials in the consolidated matters captioned Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (D. Colo.):
115 HUD Motion for Restitution
120 Housing Authority Opposition
An excerpt:
When asked at the hearing why the payments of the judgments were made during the appeal process, counsel for HUD said, “I think they thought it was, you know, the equitable thing to do.” He was right. The equitable thing for the Court to do now is to deny the motion for restitution.
Prior posts here.
Here are the materials in Jones v. Lummi Tribal Court (W.D. Wash.):
Here is the order in Jones v. Lummi (W.D. Wash.):
DCT Order on Tribal Court Exhaustion
An earlier order in this matter is here.
Here are the materials in Jones v. Lummi Tribal Court (W.D. Wash.):
Jones Habeas Petition Memorandum
Jones Reponse to Show Cause Order
R&R Recommending Jones Complaint Dismissal
DCT Order Dismissing Jones Complaint
Here is the opinion in U.S. v. Milner, which involves non-Indian shore defense structures interfering with the treaty rights of the Lummi Tribe. The U.S. charged the landowners with trespass.
You must be logged in to post a comment.