Here are the materials in Magee v. Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation (D. Nev.):
tribal court jurisdiction over nonmembers
Ninth Circuit Finds No Navajo Jurisdiction over Off-Rez Insurer
Here is the unpublished opinion in Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. McPaul.
Briefs here.
Pleadings (so far) in Insurance Company’s Effort to Avoid Navajo Nation District Court Jurisdiction
Here are the materials in Zurich American Insurance Company v. McPaul (D. Ariz.):
1-2 Navajo Nation Complaint in Chinle D. Ct.
30 Zurich Motion for Summary J
FMC Corp. v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Cert Petition [Updated]
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that tribal jurisdiction over nonmembers is established whenever a Montana exception is met, or whether, as the Seventh and Eighth Circuits have held, a court must also determine that the exercise of such jurisdiction stems from the tribe’s inherent authority to set conditions on entry, preserve tribal self-government, or control internal relations.
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit has construed the Montana exceptions to swallow the general rule that tribes lack jurisdiction over nonmembers.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Red Cliff Ojibwe Appellate Court Rejects Nonmember Challenge to Tribal Jurisdiction
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. CenturyTel of the Midwest – Kendall, LLC:
Briefs here.
Alex Skibine on Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers [now published]
Alex Tallchief Skibine has published “Incorporation Without Assimilation: Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers” in the UCLA Law Review Discourse.
The abstract:
For the last forty years the U.S. Supreme Court has been engaged in a measured attack on the sovereignty of Indian tribes when it comes to tribal court jurisdiction over people who are not members of the tribe asserting that jurisdiction. The U.S. Congress has already enacted legislation partially restoring some tribal courts’ criminal jurisdiction over nonmembers. This Article proposes to legislatively reconfirm the civil jurisdiction of tribal courts over such nonmembers. After examining the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this area and summarizing the Court’s main concerns with such tribal jurisdiction, this Article explores various legislative options before settling on a preferred course of action. The proposal set forth in the last part of this Article would reconfirm tribal court civil jurisdiction over nonmembers provided the tribal courts has established personal jurisdiction over the parties. However, tribal courts’ determinations on this subject would be appealable to federal courts. Furthermore, the Article proposes to allow nonmembers being sued in tribal courts the option of removing their cases to federal courts under certain conditions.
Federal Court Orders Tribal Exhaustion in Contract Dispute with Colville
Here are the materials in Clements v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (E.D. Wash.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.