Here are the materials in Matt v. United States (D. Mont.):
37 Fort Belknap Motion to Quash
40-1 Opposition to Motio to Quash
45 DCT Order Granting Motion to Quash
The underlying complaint against the US is here:
Here are the materials in Matt v. United States (D. Mont.):
37 Fort Belknap Motion to Quash
40-1 Opposition to Motio to Quash
45 DCT Order Granting Motion to Quash
The underlying complaint against the US is here:
Here is the unpublished opinion in ACF Leasing v. Oneida Seven Generations Corp. (PDF).
Briefs:
Here is the motion in Dillon v. BMO Harris (W.D. Okla.):
Here are materials in the North Carolina portion of this suit.
Here is the order in Fleming v. Manistique Public Safety (W.D. Mich.):
Here are the materials in Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):
Here is the opinion in State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority.
Briefs are here.
Here is the opinion in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Bettor Racing Inc. (Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribal Court):
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez is patently one of the two or three most important and perhaps controversial Supreme Court decisions affecting Indian nations and Indian people. In light of Steve Russell’s four part ICT series, we wonder what Turtle Talk readers think about Martinez.
As we think of them, we may add a question or two.
Update – here’s one!
Here are the materials in Hardie v. Nisqually Corrections Superintendent (W.D. Wash.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.