Here are the materials in United States v. Washington [subproceeding 17-03] or Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington (W.D. Wash.):
60 Motion for Reconsideration of Contempt Motion
61 DCT Order Denying Reconsideration
70 Jamestown & Port Gamble Response
74 Stillaguamish Response to 65
75 Stillaguamish Response to 64 & 66
Prior post here.
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Does an Indian Tribe have authority under the second exception of Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981), to forfeit automobiles owned by non Native Americans for violation of tribal drug laws while on tribal land?
2. If so, does the Tribe have authority to seize a motor vehicle off reservation if it has probable cause to believe that the automobile previously contained illegal drugs while on tribal lands?
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials from Doucette v. Zinke (W.D. Wash.):
11. 10-1-18 plaintiffs’ response to interior defendants’ motion to dismiss
13. 10-5-18 reply memorandum re interior defendants’ motion to dismiss
15. 12-21-18 minute order denying interior defendants’ motion to dismiss
Here is the order in Tulalip Tribes v. State of Washington (W.D. Wash.):
Prior posts here.
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington subproceeding 17-03 (W.D. Wash.):
4 Stillaguamish Request for Determination
The Western District of Washington recently dismissed Rabang v. Kelly, the case about disenrollment within the Nooksack Tribe, for lack of jurisdiction. Please see the relevant documents below.
156 6-7-18 Minute Order re Show Cause
159 6-29-18 Plaintiffs’ Brief re Show Cause Order
160-1 6-29-18 Exhibit A Letter from PDAS John Tahsuda to Roswell Cline
160-2 6-29-18 Exhibit B Letter from WSBA re Connie Sue Martin
164 7-13-18 Defendant Chief Judge Raymond G Dodge Jr’s Response to Order to Show Cause
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.