Here is the complaint in Snoqualmie Indian Tribe v. State of Washington (W.D. Wash.):
Western District of Washington
Federal Court Enjoins Lummi Tribe’s Proposed Winter Crab Fishing
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.), subproceeding no. 19-01:
1-motion-for-leave-to-file.pdf
3-request-for-determination.pdf
8-swinomish-motion-for-tro.pdf
13-upper-skagit-motion-for-tro.pdf
Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment to US on Whistleblower Claims from Former Sauk-Siuattle Employee
Federal Court Denies Nooksack Police Chief’s Motion for FTCA Certification
Here are the materials in Tageant v. Ashby (W.D. Wash.):
21-0. 9-4-19 Declaration of Deborah Alexander
22-0 9-4-19 Second Declaration of Gabriel S. Galanda
23 9-5-19 Minute Order Denying Defendant Michael Ashby’s Motion to Certify Employment
24 9-5-19 Verbatim Report of Proceedings – Motion for Employment Certification
Prior post on this case here. The case was removed from state court, and now remanded back to Whatcom County Superior Court.
Federal Court Dismisses False Claims Act Complaint against Sauk-Suiattle Employees, Awards Attorney Fees
Federal Court Declines Jurisdiction over Nisqually Officials under Ex parte Young
Here are the new materials in Bell v. City of Lacey (W.D. Wash.):
53-bell-response-to-tribe-mtd.pdf
Prior pleadings, including the tribe’s motion on the pleadings (docket no. 36), are here.
Federal Court Concludes U.S. v. Washington 11-02 Subproceeding [Lummi + S’Klallam Tribes]
Here are the new materials in United States v. Washington (W.D. Wash.) [subproceeding 11-02]:
238 Jamestown and Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribes Motion
247 Jamestown and Port Gamble Reply
255 Jamestown and Port Gamble Response
262 Jamestown and Port Gamble Surreply
Ninth Circuit materials here and here.
Previous lower court court materials here.
Prisoner Complaint against Nisqually Tribe Dismissed
Here are the materials in Bell v. City of Lacey (W.D. Wash.):
Nooksack Update: Rabang v. Kelly II (9th Cir.); Doucette v. Bernhardt (W.D. Wash))
District court materials (prior post here):
28 Doucette v. Bernhardt 3-7-19 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
34 Doucette v. Bernhardt 5-31-19 Reply re Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Ninth Circuit materials:
You must be logged in to post a comment.