Here are the materials in State of Texas v. Astorga (Tex. Ct. App. El Paso):

Here is the opinion in Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra (N.D. Dist. Ct.):
Here is the decision in United States v. Washington, subproceeding 20-01 (W.D. Wash.):
Briefs are here.

Chinook fishing on Skagit River, NWIFC
Here is the unpublished opinion in Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. Caballero.
Briefs:
Briefs are here.
Fletcher and Singel have posted “Lawyering the Indian Child Welfare Act,” forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review‘s upcoming symposium on civil rights lawyering. Here is the abstract:
This Essay describes how the statutory structure of child welfare laws enables lawyers and courts to exploit deep-seated stereotypes about American Indian people rooted in systemic racism to undermine the enforcement of the rights of Indian families and tribes. Even where Indian custodians and tribes are able to protect their rights in court, their adversaries use those same advantages on appeal to attack the Constitutional validity of the law. The primary goal of this Essay is to help expose those structural issues and the ethically troublesome practices of adoption attorneys as the most important ICWA case in history, Brackeen v. Haaland, reaches the Supreme Court.
Here is the “The Restatement of the Law of American Indians” episode of the podcast of the University of Wisconsin Law Review, “Forward.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.