Here are the materials in United States v. Webb (D. Ariz.):
Here are the materials in United States v. Webb (D. Ariz.):
Here:
The Court granted the petition here.
SCOTUSblog’s page on the case is here. Petitioner’s brief is here: Petitioner’s Brief
Here are the materials in United States v. Kirkaldie (D. Mont.):
And in United States v. Stewart (D. Mont.):
20 Stewart Motion to Dismiss + Tribal Court Docs
Kahente Horn-Miller has posted “What Does Indigenous Participatory Democracy Look Like? Kahnawà:Ke’s Community Decision Making Process” on SSRN. The paper has been published in the Review of Constitutional Studies.
Abstract here:
With the 1979 Community Mandate to move towards Traditional Government, the community of Kahnawà:ke has consistently requested more involvement in decision-making on issues that affect the community as a whole. The Kahnawà:ke Community Decision Making Process is a response to the community’s call for a more culturally relevant and inclusive process for making community decisions and enacting community laws. The Process is a transitionary measure to assist and facilitate the legislative function of Kahnawà:ke governance. This paper examines the development of the process and how it functions in the modern setting of Kahnawà:ke with the goal of illustrating Indigenous participatory democracy in action.
Kyle Whyte has posted “A Concern About Shifting Interactions between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Parties in US Climate Adaptation Contexts“on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
Indigenous peoples everywhere are preparing for or already coping with a number of climate change impacts, from rising sea-levels to shifting harvesting seasons. It is plausible that the capacity for environmental protection of two political institutions will change in relation to certain impacts: treaties and indigenous governmental jurisdictions recognised by the federal governments of nations such as the USA or Canada. This essay explores critically whether current solutions for these changes depend far too crucially on non-indigenous parties’ coming to an appropriate understanding of indigenous culture and self-determination.
Kate Fort and Carrie Garrow organized a nice group of fabulous Indian law scholars, if we don’t say so ourselves, for the 2014 Law & Society meeting. Please join us!
Carrie Garrow, Syracuse University College of Law
Kathryn Fort, Michigan State University College of Law
Kirsten Carlson, Wayne State University Law School
Matthew Fletcher, Michigan State University College of Law
Stephen Gasteyer, Michigan State University
Colette Routel, William Michell College of Law
Wenona Singel, Michigan State University College of Law
Victoria Sweet, Michigan State University College of Law
There are also other great panels at L&S:
Here are the new materials in Freeman v. Freeman (Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians Tribal Court):
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 Motion for Preliminary Injuction and Default Judgment
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 – Declaration of M Jones
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 – Second Declaration of G. Freeman
Prior posts on this issue here, here, and here.
And a related document:
You must be logged in to post a comment.