Here is the unpublished opinion in Gardner v. Ute Tribal Court.
Briefs:

Here are new materials in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of Tulsa (N.D. Okla.):
153 DCT Order Denying Criminal Defendants Motion to Intervene
154 DCT Order Denying Creek Freedmen Motion to Intervene
155 Stitt Reply ISO Motion to Intervene
167 – OPINION & ORDER (3-16-26)
Prior post here.

Shivani Singh has published “The Need for Special Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction Over Drug Crimes” in the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.
An excerpt:
Limitations to Tribal criminal jurisdiction, especially over drug crimes, have ultimately contributed to “limited law enforcement; delayed prosecutions; too few prosecutions, and other prosecution inefficiencies” that have allowed non-Indian perpetrators to exploit a failing system and endanger vulnerable Tribal communities.

Here are the materials in Wahpekeche v. Pettigrew:

Here are the materials in State of Alaska v. Hayward (Alaska Super. Ct.):

Here:
Question presented:
Whether respondents—Indians charged with felony assault in Indian country under the Major Crimes Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. 113(a)(6) and (8) and 1153(a)— were entitled both to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense not listed in the Major Crimes Act and complete acquittal if the jury found them guilty of that lesser offense.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Round Valley Indian Tribes v. Kendall (N.D. Cal.):

Prior post here.
Update (2/25/26):
Here is the opinion in United States v. Murphy.
The defendant was the subject of Sharp v. Murphy, the predecessor case to McGirt v. Oklahoma.

You must be logged in to post a comment.