Grand Forks Herald: Drop the “Fighting Sioux” Nickname

From the Herald:

A new deadline probably dooms the UND Fighting Sioux nickname and logo. That’s just as well. It’s been clear for some time that the name and logo couldn’t survive.

The reason is simple enough.

No matter the appeal of the name, the pride in it and the support for it, its use had become corrosive, damaging to the university and the state.

That’s why the Herald has urged dropping the name, sooner than later.

Opponents would never abandon the fight against it, even in the face of demonstrated support among the state’s Sioux people. That became clear in the wake of a vote last month at Spirit Lake.

The board left a small window for supporters of the name and logo. They set an Oct. 1 deadline.

At the same time, they raised the bar. The name can be retained only if the tribes agree to allow its use for at least 30 years.

Meeting these conditions will be so difficult, for so many reasons, that the name and logo appear effectively dead.

* * *

American Indian Arts and Crafts Act’s Constitutionality Challenged

Here is the opinion in Native American Arts v. Peter Stone Co., out of the Northern District of Illinois  — Peter Stone DCT Order

And here is the brief of the United States as intervenor supporting the statute — USA Memorandum re Constitutionality of Act

Seeking Amici in Religious Freedom Case in Fifth Circuit

If anyone is intersted in working on or joining a brief focusing on the American Indian community’s interest in this case, please contact Fleming Terrell at FTerrell@aclutx.org<mailto:FTerrell@aclutx.org> or (512) 478-7300 ext. 128.

—————————-

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas and the national ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief are seeking amicus support in defending against an Fifth Circuit appeal that threatens the fundamental freedoms of religious practice and expression for Texas schoolchildren, particularly those of American Indian descent.  The case is Needville Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Arocha, No. 09-20091 (5th Cir.), on appeal from A.A. et al. v. Needville Indep. Sch. Dist., No. H-08-2934 (S.D.Tx. Jan. 20, 2008).

Continue reading

Munzer & Raustiala on IP and Indigenous Traditional Knowledge

Stephen Munzer and Kal Raustiala have posted “The Uneasy Case for Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge” on SSRN. The paper appears in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 37-97, 2009. Here is the abstract:

Should traditional knowledge – -the understanding or skill possessed by indigenous peoples pertaining to their culture and folklore and their use of native plants for medicinal purposes – receive protection as intellectual property? This Article examines nine major arguments from the moral, political and legal philosophy of property for intellectual property rights and contends that, as applied to traditional knowledge (TK), they justify at most a modest package of rights under domestic and international law. The arguments involve desert based on labor; firstness; stewardship; stability; moral right of the community; incentives to innovate; incentives to commercialize; unjust enrichment, misappropriation and restitution; and infringement and dilution. These arguments do, however, support “defensive” protection for TK: that is, halting the use of TK by nonindigenous actors in obtaining patents and copyrights. These arguments also support the dissemination of TK on the internet and via other digital media and the selective use of trademarks. The force of these conclusions resides in the importance of a vibrant public domain, and the absence of any plausible limiting principle that would allow more robust rights in TK for indigenous groups without permitting equally robust rights for nonindigenous groups.

News Coverage of the Native Arts Foundation & Walter Echohawk

From the Oregonian:

Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Board Chair Walter Echo-Hawk.

The Native Arts & Cultures Foundation, which will be based in Portland, had its historic launch last week, making it the first nonprofit in the nation devoted exclusively to funding Native American arts and culture causes.

The choice to base the foundation in Portland reflects the appeal to the rest of the country of Portland — even when it’s ailing economically — as well as this area’s many layers of Native American activity and culture.

The foundation is just emerging, but some members of the Native American arts community already are impressed.

“This is visionary,” says art dealer Cecily Quintana of Quintana Galleries, a family-owned gallery that has been involved with the Native American community for 37 years. “Everything about this is encouraging. Look at the board — it’s a nationally based one.”

The foundation’s six-member board includes chairman Walter Echo-Hawk (Pawnee), a lawyer; Joy Harjo (Muscogee (Creek) Nation), a poet; Letitia Chambers, a former U.S. representative to the United Nations General Assembly; and Elizabeth Woody (Navajo/Warm Springs/Yakama), a Portland visual artist and former director of Ecotrust’s Indigenous Leadership Program. Continue reading

NYTs: Walter Echohawk Helps to Found Native Arts Foundation

Here is a pdf of the NYTs article — walter-echohawk-native-arts-foundation

Public Radio Segment on NAGPRA and Michigan Tribes

INTERLOCHEN PUBLIC RADIO (2009-04-22) For the more than a decade now Indian tribes in Michigan and elsewhere have been reclaiming objects lost over the centuries. In many cases they are also able to return to the earth the remains of long-dead ancestors. We’ll meet the researcher who does this work for one of the tribes in northern lower Michigan.

Listen here.

Arizona Supreme Court to Hear Havasupai DNA Appeal

Unfortunately for the Havasupai Tribe, the Arizona Supreme Court accepted the university’s appeal. Lower court materials are here. From Indianz:

The Arizona Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal in the Havasupai Tribe misuse of blood lawsuit.

Tribal members agreed to submit blood samples for diabetes research. But the tribe sued Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University and the University of Arizona after discovering the samples were used for studies on migration, inbreeding and mental illness. A judge dismissed the case but the Arizona Court of Appeals revived it last November. One of the parties asked the state Supreme Court to review the decision.

Continue reading

Federal Magistrate Judge Recused from American Indian Religious Freedom Case

The case is United States v. Baca, out of the Eastern District of California. The defendant, Baca, is being charged by the federal government for filming on government property without a permit and trespassing on a cultural resource. He was filming a tribal ceremony at Yosemite (Yosemite Big Time). He was convicted in a bench trial before a federal magistrate, but the district court vacated the conviction on the grounds that the magistrate should have recused himself for bias. Apparently, the judge has a hangman’s noose in his office, prominently featured in a local newspaper article.

It’ll be interesting to see how Baca’s defense (religious freedom, assertion that he is a religious leader, etc.) will play out in the next trial….

baca-dct-order

baca-appellant-brief

news-article-about-magistrate

government-response-brief-baca

baca-reply-brief

United States v. Akeen — Illegal Sale of Eagle Feathers at Powwow

Here is the indictment in United States v. Akeen (us-v-akeen-complaint). This is for a sale of eagle feathers at a powwow in Oregon, allegedly violative of the Lacey Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Thanks to J. for the tip (also reported in Indianz).