Here is the opinion in Held v. State of Montana:
Prior post here.
Environmental
Bad River Ojibwe Petitions for Review of Wisconsin’s Approval of Re-Route of Line 5
Tribal Amicus Brief in Nessel v. Enbridge [Mich. Cir. Ct.]
Ninth Circuit Materials in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Dept. of the Interior [Federal Superfund Land Exchange something something]
Yurok Tribe Sues Reclamation over Trinity River Flow
Environmental Law Institute Tribal Consultation Policy Hub
Here:
The ELI Digital Consultation Hub serves as a comprehensive platform to build the capacity of Tribal, state, and local policymakers in implementing best practices in government-to-government consultation. The database includes documents from Tribal, state, and federal governments that guide consultation as it pertains to culture, land use, and natural resources.
Arizona Federal Judge Enjoins Lithium Exploration Affecting Ha’Kamwe’
Here the materials in Hualapai Indian Tribe v. Haaland (D. Ariz.):
72 Arizona Lithium Post-Hearing Brief
74 Hualapai Post-Hearing Brief
Complaint is here.
SCOTUS Denies Cert in San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Arizona
Standing Rock Sioux Sues Army Corps to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline
Here is the complaint in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.):
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Arizona Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
(1) Did the Arizona Supreme Court err by determining that 40 C.F.R § 122.29(b)’s new source analysis is satisfied by merely finding a “material connection” between a newly constructed source of polluted discharge and an existing source rather than considering whether the new source operationally depends on the existing source? (2) Did the Arizona Supreme Court err by determining that new source performance standards for copper mines in 40 C.F.R. § 440.104 do not “independently apply” to Resolution’s new mine?
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.