Earlier, the federal district court had held the federal bankruptcy act doesn’t abrogate tribal sovereign immunity.
Here are the materials in In re Greektown Holdings LLC (E.D. Mich. Bkrcy.):
Earlier, the federal district court had held the federal bankruptcy act doesn’t abrogate tribal sovereign immunity.
Here are the materials in In re Greektown Holdings LLC (E.D. Mich. Bkrcy.):
Download(PDF): Brochure
The conference is December 8-9 in Seattle.
Here are the materials in the matter of Navajo Nation et al v. Marsh et al, 15-cv-00799 (D. N.M. 2016):
Doc. 12 – Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 13 – Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 17 – McNeal Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 19 – Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 21 – Memorandum Opinion and Order
Link to previously posted complaint here.
From mLive.com:
The Gun Lake Tribe of Pottawatomi Indians and the state of Michigan have agreed to split $21.7 million as a “partial settlement” of a dispute over the Michigan Lottery’s creation of online ticket sales and lottery terminals in social clubs.
Here are the materials and documents in the matter of Butte County, CA v. Chadhouri et al, 08-cv-00519 (D.C. July 15, 2016):
Doc. 125 – United States’ Reply in Support of its Cross Motion for Summary Judgment
Doc. 128 – Memorandum-Decision and Order
Link to previous coverage here.
Download Petition for Writ of Certiorari (PDF)
Link to briefs previously posted here.
Question Presented: Whether the sovereign immunity of an Indian tribe bars individual-capacity damages actions against tribal employees for torts committed within the scope of their employment.
Download Vol. 1 No.1 (Spring 2016) here.
Here is the USET brief in Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. NLRB:
USET Amicus in Support of Tribal Petitions
This one is substantially the same as USET’s brief in the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government v. NLRB case.
Here are the materials in Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States (D.D.C.):
19-1 US Motion to Transfer Venue
22-1 Menominee Motion to Intervene
27 FCPC Opposition to Menominee Intervention Motion
33 DCT Order Denying Motion to Transfer
We posted the complaint way back in early 2015.
Here are the materials in Lewis v. Clarke (Conn.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.