Here is the opinion:
Briefs here.
IGRA
NIGC Settlement Materials re: St. Croix Chippewa
California SCT Decides United Auburn Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. Newsom
Here is the opinion:
An excerpt:
This is a case about how California law applies to the delicate juncture of executive power, federalism, and tribal sovereignty. Under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA; 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.), the United States Secretary of the Interior (Interior Secretary) may permit casino-style gaming on certain land taken into federal trust for an Indian tribe, so long as the Governor of the state where the land is located concurs. But nowhere in the California Constitution is the Governor granted explicit authority to concur in this cooperative-federalism scheme. We must decide whether the
Governor nonetheless has the authority to concur in the Interior Secretary’s determination to allow gaming on tribal trust land in California.What we hold is that California law empowers the Governor to concur.
Briefs here.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior
Tribes Sues California over Gaming Compact Negotiations
Here is the complaint in Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):
Oklahoma Tribes Sue Interior over Gaming Compact Approvals
Here is the complaint in Cherokee Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
1-2 Otoe-Missouria Gaming Compact
Update:
Federal Court Holds Oklahoma Gaming Compacts Automatically Extend to 2035
Here are the materials in Cherokee Nation v. Stitt (W.D. Okla.):
125-1 Tribes Motion for Summary Judgment
126 State Motion for Summary Judgment
128 Wichita Tribes Motion for Summary Judgment
142 State Response to Wichita Tribes
Case tag here.
Buena Vista Rancheria Suit over Casino Taxes
Here is the complaint in Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians v. Amador County (E.D. Cal.):
Second Circuit Briefs in Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York [gaming dispute arbitration award]
California SCT Briefs in United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. Newsom
S238544 – UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA v. NEWSOM
(Groban, J., not participating, Fybel, J., assigned justice pro tempore)
- Appellant’s Petition for Review
Filed on November 22, 2016 - Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice Filed on November 22, 2016
- Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice Filed on December 14, 2016
- Appellant’s Opening Brief on the Merits Filed on March 27, 2017
- Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice Filed on March 28, 2017
- Respondent’s Answer Brief on the Merits Filed on June 26, 2017
- Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits Filed on August 23, 2017
- Amicus Curiae Brief of The Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California and The Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community Filed on September 28, 2017
- Amicus Curiae Brief of Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians Filed on October 10, 2017
- Amicus Curiae Brief of North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Filed on October 10, 2017
- Amicus Curiae Brief of Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria, California, Filed on October 10, 2017
- Amicus Curiae Brief of Stand Up For California! Filed on October 10, 2017
- Respondent’s Response to Amicus Curiae Brief Filed on December 8, 2017
- Respondent’s Supplemental Brief Filed on May 22, 2020
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.