D.C. Circuit Briefs in Amador County v. Dept. of Interior

Here:

Amador County Opening Brief

DOI Answer Brief

Reply

Lower court materials in Amador County v. Jewell (D.D.C.):

76-1 Amador County Motion

77 US Motion

81 Amador County Response

83 US Reply

84 DCT Order

Kalispel Sues Interior over Spokane Casino

Here is the complaint in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Wash.):

1 Complaint

First Circuit Rules in Favor of Aquinnah in Gaming Dispute

Here is the opinion in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah).

Briefs here.

House Resources Committee Chair Demands BIA Reverse Obama Administration Gaming Decisions

Here:

2017-02-15 Bishop letter to Cason

California Prevails in Gaming Compact Dispute with Chemeheuvi Tribe

Here are the materials in Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. Brown (C.D. Cal.):

80-1 State Motion

81-1 Tribe Motion

82 State Opposition

83 Tribe Opposition

85 Tribe Reply

87 State Reply

92 DCT Order

Federal Court Partially Dismisses Pauma Band Claims against California’s Use of Gaming Compact Special Distribution Fund

Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.):

19-1 Motion to Dismiss

22 Opposition

25 Reply

26 DCT Order

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Zinke

Here is today’s order list.

Here are the cert stage briefs.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Jamul Action Committee Appeal

Here are the briefs (so far) in Jamul Action Committee v. [Chaudhuri]:

Jamul Action Committee Opening Brief

Federal Answer Brief

Tribe Answer Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

D.C. Circuit Briefs in Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior:

Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief

Stand Up Opening Brief

Federal Brief

North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief

Picayune Reply

Stand Up Reply

Lower court materials here.

Federal Court Holds Special Congressional Recognition of Frank’s Landing Is Not Federal Recognition

Here are the materials in Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. National Indian Gaming Commission (W.D. Wash.):

33 Frank’s Landing Motion for Summary J

38 US Cross Motion for Summary J

39 Frank’s Lansing Reply

40 US Reply

41 DCT Order