D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Seminole Gaming Compact

Here is the opinion in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Haaland.

Briefs are here.

California COA Rejects Effort to Force Release of Gaming Funds through Attorney’s Lien

Here are the materials in Corrales v. California Gambling Control Commission:

Jaune Smith

Briefs:

Ninth Circuit Denies Attorney Fees to Chicken Ranch

Here is the opinion in Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California v. State of California.

Briefs here.

California Prevails over Alturas Rancheria in IGRA Good Faith Negotiations Suit

Here are the materials in Alturas Indian Rancheria v. Newsom (E.D. Cal.):

Prior post with complaint here.

D.C. Federal Court Rejects Sault Tribe’s Third Effort to Force Interior to Acquire Land for Off-Rez Gaming

Here is the order in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland (D.D.C.):

Briefs here.

Oklahoma Federal Court Dismisses Zombie Challenge to Gaming Compacts

Here are updated materials in Cherokee Nation v. Stitt, now captioned Wichita & Affiliated Tribes v. Stitt (W.D. Okla.):

Prior post here.

Washington Federal Court Dismisses Constitutional Challenge to Washington Class III Compacts Allowing Tribal Sports Betting

DALL-E’s interpretation of “tribal sovereign immunity”

Here is the order in Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States (W.D. Wash.):

Briefs here.

Massachusetts Federal Court Decides Littlefield v. Dept. of the Interior [Mashpee Wampanoag]

Here are the materials in Littlefield v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Mass.):

45 Littlefield Motion for Summary J

47 Interior Cross-Motion

49 Tribe Cross-Motion

50 Littlefield Reply

51 Interior Reply

52 Tribe Reply

55 DCT Order

Sault Tribe/Kewadin Gaming Enjoined from Concealing or Dissipating Assets in Gaming Development Company Dispute [recall the $88M judgment]

Here is the order in JLLJ Development LLC v. Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority (Mich. Cir. Ct.):

Prior post here.

California Federal Court Dismisses New Amended Complaint in Coyote Valley Contract Case

Here are the updated materials in Coyote Band of Pomo Indians v. Findleton (N.D. Cal.):

91 Second Amended Complaint

95 Motion to Dismiss

103 Combined Opposition

104 Reply in Support of 95

105 Reply in Support of 100

Prior post here.