Here is today’s order list.
Casino Pauma cert stage materials here.
Havasupai v. Provencio materials here.
Here:
Features articles about Canadian Indian labor issues and a paper by Kaighn Smith and Joel Williams: “Native Americans, Tribal Sovereignty and Unions.”
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Should this Court reconsider Chevron?
2. Does the National Labor Relations Act apply to Indian tribes?
3. Does the employee-to-employee solicitation rule in Republic Aviation empower employees to solicit customers in business “guest areas” like restrooms and restaurants?
Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here International Union (S.D. Cal.):
20-1 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint
28 Union Reply in Support of 14
29 State Reply in Support of 15
34-1 Union MTD Second Amended Complaint
36-1 State MTD Second Amended Complaint
39 Union Reply in Support of 34
Here is the unpublished opinion in Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. UNITE HERE International Union.
Briefs:
Oral argument video here.
Lower court materials here.
Prior cases here.
Here is the opinion in Casino Pauma v. NLRB. From the court’s syllabus:
The panel granted the National Labor Relations Board’s petition for enforcement of its order; denied Casino Pauma’s petition for review; and upheld the Board’s conclusions that it may apply the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) to the relationship between employees working in commercial gaming establishments on tribal lands and the tribal governments that own and manage the establishments, and that Casino Pauma committed unfair labor practices in violation of the NLRA by trying to stop union literature distribution.
Briefs here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.