2014 ILPC Third Panel

Tiffani Darden, Eric Hemenway, and Treena Metallic

IMG_1050.JPG

IMG_1054.JPG

ILPC Conference First Panel — Dr. Suzanne Cross and Hunter Genia

IMG_1042.JPG

IMG_1041.JPG

11th ILPC Conference Pics

Keynote speaker Kevin Washburn

IMG_1031.JPG

Dean Howarth and Assistant Secretary Washburn

IMG_1018.JPG

NALSA Representing

IMG_1022.JPG

IMG_1024.JPG

Tribal In House Counsel Reps — Doreen and Liz

IMG_1025.JPG

Hungry Indians

IMG_1021.JPG

IMG_1020.JPG

Zaagi’idiwaag

IMG_1027.JPG

The keynote

IMG_1034.JPG

IMG_1036.JPG

IMG_1037.JPG

IMG_1035.JPG

Friends of Amador County v. Jewell Cert Stage Briefs

Here:

FAC Cert Petition

Buena Vista Rancheria Opposition

FAC Reply

Question presented:

Whether, in an action by a third party against the Secretary of the Interior under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., a putative Indian tribe may invoke its sovereign immunity to prevent a court from reviewing the lawfulness of the Secretary’s decision to recognize it as a tribe.

Lower court materials here.

Harvard Law Review Comment on Michigan v. Bay Mills

Here is Leading Case: Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024 (2014).

An excerpt:

While the Court’s decision is a victory for those who feared the abrogation of tribal immunity, its suggestion that states seek remedies in state law signals approval of leaving the resolution of legal questions central to state-tribe disputes to the states, even when the question concerns the extent of Indian land. Such a view would be inconsistent with recent trends generally favoring greater federal control and congressional support for tribal self-determination, and could result in actions that are detrimental to tribes.

Sixth Circuit Briefs in Kelsey v. Pope

Here:

Appellant Opening Brief + Appendices

NCAI Amicus Brief + Appendix

US Amicus Brief

Kelsey Brief

NACDL Amicus Brief

Reply Brief

Lower court materials here.

Justice Cavanagh and Chief Judge Petoskey to be Presented with Nelson Mandela Peacemaking Award

Here (PDF):

Peacemaking Award Dinner flyer

Updated Materials in Michigan v. Sault Tribe — State Seeks to Sue Tribal Officials

Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):

49 Renewed Motion to Dismiss

53-1 State Motion for Relief

55 State Response to Motion to Dismiss

57 Soo Tribe Reply

58 Soo Tribe Response to Motion for Relief

60 State Reply

63 DCT Order to Adjourn and Reschedule Oral Argument

Sixth Circuit materials are here.

 

Michigan SCT Justice Mike Cavanagh OpEd: “Inaugural tribal-state court forum addresses child welfare issues”

Justice Cavanagh’s op/ed is available here.

An excerpt:

Our inaugural Tribal State Federal Judicial Forum meeting this week focused on issues of Indian child welfare, on outlining the scope of the Forum’s work, and on organizing our leadership. We examined what forums in other states are doing to find examples of best practices and innovations. Also, we delved into the ICWA as the “gold standard,” as well as the importance of judicial leadership and collaboration.

Because we can’t know where we should be headed if we don’t know where we are now, the Forum also received updates on Michigan Indian child welfare data, and child welfare services and resources from the State Court Administrative Office.

Most importantly, the Forum finalized our Naakonigewin, or Charter, which defines our make-up, appointment process, and governance. The Charter will not only solidify and formalize a valuable, long-standing relationship, but it also will lay the groundwork for future collaborations among the courts. The Charter will guarantee that while the names may change, the mission will continue.

As we opened our meeting with a traditional tribal pipe ceremony and drums, I had the honor of sharing some reflections on my lifelong commitment to improving relations between our sovereign governments and our people. I am also excited to hand over my role as Supreme Court Tribal Liaison Justice to the Forum to Justice Bridget McCormack. I have no doubt she will bring even more passion and dedication to the task.

I am positive that the Forum, under the guidance of Justice McCormack, its tribal and state judge co-chairs, and the participation of many of the state’s and tribes’ most dedicated jurists, will continue to find common ground to accomplish wonderful things for all our children. The measure of our success will be reflected in strong relationships, linking our peoples, learning from the lessons of the past and leading our children to a better future.

CMU Native American Heritage Month Schedule

Here (PDF):

NAHM Final