Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Van Pelt III]

Here are the materials in Van Pelt III v. Geisen (D.N.M.):

1 Habeas Petition

2 Amended Petition

18 Answer

19 Motion to Release

25 Tribe Brief

33 Magistrate Report

Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Tortalita]

Here are the materials in Tortalita v. Geisen (D.N.M.):

1 Habeas Petition

7 Motion to Release

24 Tribe Brief

33 Magistrate Report

Federal Magistrate Recommends Granting ICRA Habeas Petition of Kewa Pueblo Prisoner [Garcia]

Here are the materials in Garcia v. Geisen (D.N.M.):

1 Habeas Petition

15 Motion for Release

27 Tribe Brief

36 Magistrate Report

ILADA Blog [McGill Law]: Seasonal Thematic Contributions by Indigenous Legal Scholars

Here:

Season 1:  Law Through Language (2018)

Our first season focuses on language as law: within the context of language revitalization, how do Indigenous laws pronounce themselves through language? How can Indigenous laws be strengthened, given the impact of colonialism on Indigenous languages? And can the changes required to revitalize—funds, experts, and the privileging of resources—create additional inequities? This season seeks to answer these questions among others.

This season aims first and foremost to address the crucial relationship between language and law: in particular, the role Indigenous languages play in articulating Indigenous laws. Writing about the Navajo people, Anishinaabe scholar Matthew Fletcher emphasizes, “for many tribal communities, the law is encoded right into the language – and the stories generated from the language.”1 Because most Indigenous communities historically expressed (and continually express) their customs and laws orally, this statement applies to Indigenous groups broadly.2 This season features contributors who explore expressions of law and answer questions about how language deepens and complicates protocols, interpretations and worldviews.

We recognize inherent challenges in this exercise: communities experience “law” in different forms and may not identify practices and behaviours as law in the same way that they are identified in Western legal normativity. What one group claims as “law” may be something entirely different to another; and not everything is translatable into English or French—nor should it be. As John Borrows stated, “context should not be stripped from the practice of Indigenous law.”3 Often, that context is language. Our contributors this season help to tease out how Indigenous languages limit and liberate, stymie and enable, and generally complicate the articulation of Indigenous law.

 

The State of Canada’s Indigenous Languages by Katsi’tsakwas Ellen Gabriel

Indonaakonigewininaan – Toward an Anishinaabe Common Law by Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Language and Anishinaabe Consultation Law by John Borrows


1 Matthew Fletcher, “Rethinking Customary Law in Tribal Court Jurisprudence” (2007) 13 Mich J Race & L 57 at 21.

2 Ibid at 41, “Indian cultures (often) were and are oral cultures.”

3 Borrows, John, “Foreword: Indigenous Law, Lands, and Literature,” (2016) 33 Windsor YB Access to Just v at ix.

Update in Rabang v. Kelly

Here are new docs:

4-11-18 Order Denying Defendants’ Rule 62.1 Motion For Indicative Ruling Regarding Dismissal

4-11-18 Rabang v. Kelly (9th Cir.) Kelly Appellants’ Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of Appeal

4-11-18 Rabang v. Kelly (9th Cir.) Notice of District Court Decision Denying Appellants’ Motion For Indicative Ruling

4-11-18 Rabang v. Kelly (W.D. Wash.) Order Denying Defendants’ Rule 62.1 Motion For Indicative Ruling Regarding Dismissal

Kalyn Free Sues Muscogee AG and Tribal Court over Jurisdiction

Here is the complaint in Free v. Dellinger (N.D. Okla.):

2 Complaint

UPDATE (5/14/2018):

3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction

9 Tribe Motion to Dismiss

14 Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss

15 Tribal Court Opposition

20 Free Response to 14

Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Challenge to Seminole Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Here is the unpublished opinion in Asker v. Seminole Tribe of Florida Inc.:

Unpublished Opinion

Briefs here.

FBA Indian Law Conference ICRA Panel

Karla General, Angela Riley, Terri Smith, Se-ah-dom Edmo, and Josh Clause

380DE011-16CF-4D47-A531-A912F85F7332

NAICJA Save the Date (Oct. 16-19) and Call for Papers (Due April 20)

One of my favorite conferences of the year–and I always offer to do an ICWA/transfer to tribal court case law update!

RFP for Presentations- 2018 NAICJA Conference – DUE APRIL 20th!

Federal Court Excuses Additional Tribal Court Exhaustion in Oil/Gas Flaring Dispute at Fort Berthold

Here are the materials in Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. Burr (D.N.D.):

29-2 mha trial court opinion

29-9 mha nation supreme court opinion

30 kodiak motion for pi

45 tribal judge motion to dismiss

46 burr response to motion for pi

48 tribal judge response to motion for pi

54 kodiak reply in support of motion for pi

59 hrc motion for pi

62 tribal judge reply in support of mtd

64 hrc response to mtd

66 tribal judge response to hrc motion

68 dct order