Here are the materials in Cherokee Nation v. Dept, of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.

Here are the materials in Cherokee Nation v. Dept, of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.

Here is the unpublished order in Numa Corp. v. Diven, formerly Cedarville Rancheria v. Diven.
Briefs here.

Here is the amended complaint in Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. First National Band and Trust Company of Okmulgee (E.D. Okla.):

Here.

Here are the materials so far in United States v. Peterson (N.D. Cal.):
Here is the opinion in San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Beccera.
An excerpt:
A simplified example clarifies this scheme. Assume that a tribe administers a $3 million healthcare program for its members. It costs the tribe $500,000 in administrative costs to do so. IHS therefore will pay the tribe $3.5 million. Additionally, the tribe recovers $1 million for those procedures from outside insurers. It is statutorily required to spend that $1 million on health care as well.
But there is a hole in this statutory scheme. Who pays the CSC for that additional $1 million in health care that the tribe must provide with its third-party revenue? At the heart of this lawsuit is Plaintiff-Appellant San Carlos Apache Tribe’s (“the Tribe”) contention that IHS must cover those additional CSC.
Briefs here.

Here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.