Split Ninth Circuit Panel Allows Oak Flat Mining to Proceed

Here is the opinion in Apache Stronghold v. United States.

Briefs here.

US and Alaska Tribal Groups Win Injunction on State Subsistence Rules

Here are the materials in United States v. State of Alaska (D. Alaska):

Do not f*** with them.
[Library of Congress put that “uncivilized” bulls*** in there.]

Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Company Sues for Greater Control over its Lending Business

Here is the complaint in Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services LLC v. Cane Bay Partners VI LLLP (W.D. Wis.):

Strict Scrutiny Podcast Recap of Denezpi and Ysleta Decisions

Here, starting around 18:15, right after the Leeroy Jenkins discussion.

Leeroy Jenkins starts around 1:23 in this YouTube video.

GTB Chief Judge/MSU Law Alum Ken Akini Appointed to Michigan Supreme Court DEI Commission

Here.

Not a representation of Judge Akini . . .

SCOTUS Denies Cert in 1 Indian Law Case

Here is today’s order list.

The denied petition is Acres Bonusing Inc. v. Marston — cert stage briefs here:

Acres Bonusing Cert Petition

Opposition

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Tribes’ Amicus Brief in SCT Case on Scope of Clean Water Act

Here is the brief in Sackett v. EPA:

Leech Lake Ojibwe Elected Official Sues Interior over Eligibility to Serve

Here are the materials in LaRose v. Haaland (D. Minn.):

New Scholarship on the Persistence of Tribal Sovereignty

Seth Davis, Eric Biber & Elena Kempf have published “Persistent Sovereignties” in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Here is the abstract:

From the first days of the United States, the story of sovereignty has not been one of a simple division between the federal government and the states of the Union. Then, as today, American Indian tribes persisted as self-governing peoples with ongoing and important political relationships with the United States. And then, as today, there was debate about the proper legal characterization of those relationships.
The United States Supreme Court confronted that debate in McGirt v. Oklahoma when, in an opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, it held that the reservation of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation “persists today.” The Court’s recognition of the persistence of Tribal sovereignty triggered a flurry of critical commentary, including from federal lawmakers who share Justice Gorsuch’s commitment to originalism. But the early history of federal Indian law supports the persistence of tribal sovereignty.

Ninth Circuit Materials in Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe v. Department of the Interior

Here are the briefs: