Federal Court Dismisses Remaining Claims of Wapato Heritage in Colville Leasing Matter

Here are the materials in Grondal v. United States (E.D. Wash.):

275 Colville Motion to Dismiss

570 US Motion to Dismiss

571 Colville Supplemental Brief re 275

572 Wapato Motion for Partial Summary J

577 Wapato Response to 275

588 Colville Reply in Support of 275

589 Wapato Response to 570

592 US Response to 572

605 US Reply in Support of 570

644 DCT Order

646 US Motion to Dismiss

649 Response

651 Reply

652 DCT Order

Prior post here.

WaPo: “Canada’s Supreme Court to consider whether Native Americans in U.S. have rights north of the border”

Here.

The Supreme Court of Canada materials on Her Majesty the Queen v. Richard Lee Desautel are here.

Federal Court Orders Eviction of Campers from Colville Allotment [. . . It’s a long story]

Here are the materials in Grondal v. Mill Bay Members Assn. (E.D. Wash.):

1-grondal-complaint.pdf

232-us-motion-for-ejectment.pdf

295-opposition-to-232.pdf

306-reply.pdf

329 DCT Order re Appointment of Counsel

411 DCT Order re Representation of Indian Allottees

438-plaintiffs-response-to-232.pdf

439-plaintiffs-motion-for-summary-judgment.pdf

441-colville-response-232.pdf

465-us-response-to-439.pdf

469-colville-response-to-439.pdf

483-reply-in-support-of-439.pdf

503-dct-order.pdf

Related post here.

Ninth Circuit Affirms in Pakootas v. Teck Caminco Metals

Here is the opinion.

Briefs here.

Washington Supreme Court Visits Tribal Land For Public Outreach, To Hear Cases

Here.

Colville Member Prevails in B.C.’s High Court on Right to Hunt in Canada

Here’s a news article.  Mr. Desautel prevailed as a descendant of the Sinixt Tribe. Decision is here.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Pakootas v. Teck Caminco Metals

Here:

Teck Caminco Opening Brief

State of Washington Answer Brief

Colville Answer Brief

Reply

Colville Tribes Comment on Sinixt Case

Historic Victory for Sinixt Hunter Claiming Aboriginal Right to Hunt in Canada

Nelson, B.C. – In a landmark decision, the Provincial Court of British Columbia ruled today that Richard Desautel, a Sinixt descendant resident in the United States, has an aboriginal right to hunt in his traditional territory in Canada.

In 2010, Mr. Desautel was charged with hunting elk as a non-resident, and without a license, near Castlegar, B.C.    He is a member of the Lakes or Sinixt tribe of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in Washington State, and asserted a constitutionally protected right to hunt in Sinixt traditional territory in Canada.  Sinixt territory stretches north from the Colville Reservation to the area in and around the Arrow Lakes in British Columbia. Link to decision here: http://canlii.ca/t/h2ss2

British Columbia Court Affirms Aboriginal Hunting and Fishing Rights in Favor of Sinixt People (Suit Involved Colville Tribal Member)

Here is the opinion in R. v. Desautel:

R v Desautel

Three Recent California ICWA Cases

Reported case on notice, where the social service agency attempted to fix the notice issues while the case was on appeal. Fourth District remanded for proper notice.

An unreported case where the trial court refused to apply ICWA because of a lack of written communication from the tribe, though the agency received verbal confirmation of the children’s membership. The case was reversed, also by the Fourth District.

Finally, an unreported case using the “family lore” argument to find there was no notice necessary. Haven’t seen a family lore case in California since 2011. Those cases were all out of the Second District, while this one is out of the First.