Here:
Questions presented:
1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community.
2. This case presents the question whether multiple Indians residing on the same reservation are, per se, an “Indian tribe” irrespective of the individual Indians‘ tribal affiliations, if any.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the opinion in Ho-Chunk, Inc. v. Sessions.
Briefs here.
Here is the petition in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Federal Communications Commission (D.C. Cir.):
Here is the petition in United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma v. Federal Communications Commission (D.C. Cir.):
Here is the opinion in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534):
Link: Previous posts, other documents related to Dakota Access Pipeline
Here is the unpublished opinion in Amador County v. Dept. of Interior:
Here are the briefs.
Here are the documents in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534):
Other materials posted here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.