Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Case tag here.
Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Materials here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
57 Motion to Supplement Record
62 DCT Order Denying Motion to Supplement Record
80 DCT Order Denying Second Motion
91 Stand Up Motion for Summary Judgmen
Prior post here.
Here are the pleadings in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
Case tag here.
Here are the materials so far in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
1-1 Solicitor Opinion on Bay Mills
1-6 July 2017 Interior Decision
16-1 Saginaw Chippewa Motion to Intervene
18-1 Detroit Casinos Motion to Intervene
20 Nottawaseppi Huron Band Motion to Intervene
28 Sault Tribe Opposition to Intervention Motions
29 Federal Opposition to Detroit Casinos Motion to Intervene
31 Saginaw Chippewa Reply in Support of 16
32 Detroit Casinos Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
33 NHBPI Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
Prior posts on the Lansing/Wayne County casino proposals are here.
Here is the petition captioned Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. Zinke [but presumably will switch to Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. Bernhardt]:
Companche v Zinke Cert Petition
Question presented:
Whether the “former reservation” exception permitting lands acquired by the United States in trust for an Oklahoma Tribe after the effective date of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 to be devoted to gaming purposes, is applicable to lands not subject to Tribal jurisdiction prior to the acquisition.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Cal-Pac Rancho Cordova LLC v. United States Department of the Interior (E.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Crawford-Hall v. United States (C.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Crawford-Hall v. United States (C.D. Cal.):
1-2 BIA Pacific Region Notice of Decision
28-1 US Motion for Partial Dismiss
40 Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief
44 Plaintiffs Supp Response Brief
You must be logged in to post a comment.