Here:
Questions presented:
1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community.
2. This case presents the question whether multiple Indians residing on the same reservation are, per se, an “Indian tribe” irrespective of the individual Indians‘ tribal affiliations, if any.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
33 Stand Up Motion for Summary J
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior:
Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
106-1-sufc-motion-for-summary-j
108-1-picayune-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j
111-1-north-fork-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j
Here are updated materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record
86 North Fork Rancheria Answer
Amended complaint here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D. D.C.):
Interior Motion to Change Venue
Interior Response to Picayune Memorandum
Turtle Talk 