Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig (D.N.D.):
1-8 MHA Nation Supreme Court Decision
8 Fettig Answer + Counterclaim
13 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim
Prior post here.

Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. Fettig (D.N.D.):
1-8 MHA Nation Supreme Court Decision
8 Fettig Answer + Counterclaim
13 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim
Prior post here.

Here is the unpublished opinion in Lexington Insurance Co. v. Mueller.
Briefs are here.
Here is the order denying en banc review in Lexington Ins. Co. v. Smith and accompanying opinions.
En banc stage briefs:
Panel materials here.

Here is the unpublished opinion:
Lower court materials here.
Check out “The Sovereignty Problem in Federal Indian Law” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
There is a sovereignty problem in federal Indian law, namely, that the federal government’s sovereign defenses prevent tribal nations and individual Indian people from realizing justice in the courts. Often, compelling tribal and Indian claims go nowhere as the judiciary defers to the interests of the United States, even where Congress has expressly stated its support for tribal interests. Conversely, tribal judiciaries allow claims to proceed to the merits, invoking customary and traditional law to hold tribal governments accountable.
Sovereignty theory helps to explain why justice can be done in one court system but not another. But federal, state, and tribal courts are all American courts than can and should learn from one another. This paper is an effort to show that federal sovereign defenses are not inevitable, nor are they even necessary.

Here are the new materials in Eagle Bear Inc. v. Blackfeet Indian Nation (D. Mont.):

Prior post here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.