Materials in Warm Springs Tribe Contract Dispute over Timber Revenues

Here are the materials so far in Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. Vanport International, Inc. (D. Or.):

1 Complaint

54 Warm Springs MSJ

65 Vanport Response

74 Reply

84 DCT Order

News Profile of “Driving While Indian”

Here is “Data from millions of traffic stops reveal there is ‘driving while Indian'”

Nooksack Year-End Update

Here:

Adams v. Whatcom County

Plaintiff sues Whatcom County for Section 1983 civil rights violations associated with her imprisonment pursuant to a Tribal Court arrest warrant.

1-0. 10-31-19 Complaint

In re Z.A.G. (state court parenting suit)

Superior Court rules Tribal Court lacks jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.

9-13-19 Child Custody Motion – Adams v. Galindo

10-17-19 Order Granting Motion for Declaratory Relief – Galindo v Adams

Adams v. Dodge (state court tort suit)

Defendant Tribal Court Chief Judge Ray Dodge countersues Plaintiffs for libel.

9-17-19 Defendants’ Answer and Affirmative Defenses to First Amended Complaint and Defendant Dodge’s Counterclaim for Libel

Adams v. Dodge (Elfo) (federal habeas corpus suit)

Petitioner’s petition for ICRA writ of habeas corpus is amended by stipulation to name Nooksack Tribal Court Respondents, who move to dismiss.

 

12-0. 9-20-19 Respondents’ Return to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motions for Dismissal

16. 10-14-19 Response to Respondents’ Return to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motions for Dismissal

20. 10-16-19 Stipulation and Order

21-0. 10-18-19 Second Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus

25-0. 11-22-19 Respondents’ Return to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Dismiss

28. 11-27-19 Respondent Judges Dodg and Majumdar’s Return to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

29. 12-9-19 Response to Respondents’ Return to Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Dismiss

Rabang v. Kelly (federal civil RICO suit/appeal)

Ninth Circuit further holds Rabang in abeyance, pending the appeal in Doucette.

41. 9-16-19 Order

Doucette v. Zinke (federal APA suit/appeal)

Plaintiff-Appellants notice their appeal to the Ninth Circuit

43. 8-30-19 Notice of Appeal

Tageant v. Ashby (state court tort suit)

Plaintiff amends her personal capacity suit against Nooksack Police Chief Mike Ashby.

12-13-19 Amended Complaint

 

Split Ninth Circuit Panel Affirms Dismissal of Muckleshoot U&A Appeal

Here is the opinion in Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Tulalip Tribes, subproceeding 17-02 of United States v. Washington.

Briefs here.

Oklahoma SCT Holds Tax on Video Game Machines Used at Cherokee Casinos is Preempted by Federal Law

Here is the opinion in Video Game Technologies v. Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections.

Here is a related opinion involving machines at the Creek casinos, Video Game Technologies v. Tulsa County Board of Tax Roll Corrections.

Little Shell Chippewa Tribe Nears Federal Recognition

Here is news coverage.

Alex Skibine on Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers [now published]

Alex Tallchief Skibine has published “Incorporation Without Assimilation: Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers” in the UCLA Law Review Discourse.

The abstract:

For the last forty years the U.S. Supreme Court has been engaged in a measured attack on the sovereignty of Indian tribes when it comes to tribal court jurisdiction over people who are not members of the tribe asserting that jurisdiction. The U.S. Congress has already enacted legislation partially restoring some tribal courts’ criminal jurisdiction over nonmembers. This Article proposes to legislatively reconfirm the civil jurisdiction of tribal courts over such nonmembers. After examining the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this area and summarizing the Court’s main concerns with such tribal jurisdiction, this Article explores various legislative options before settling on a preferred course of action. The proposal set forth in the last part of this Article would reconfirm tribal court civil jurisdiction over nonmembers provided the tribal courts has established personal jurisdiction over the parties. However, tribal courts’ determinations on this subject would be appealable to federal courts. Furthermore, the Article proposes to allow nonmembers being sued in tribal courts the option of removing their cases to federal courts under certain conditions.

Split Minnesota COA Rejects Treaty Rights Defense in Prosecution for Fishing on Gull Lake by Fond du Lac Member

Here is the unpublished opinion in State v. Northrup:

state-v-northrup.pdf

Split Minnesota COA Panel Affirms Authority of Tribal Police Office Outside Reservation Boundaries Acting under Cross-Dep Agreement

Here is the opinion in State v. Bellcourt:

Bellcourt Opinion

U.S. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Rejects Oglala Sioux Tribe Challenge to Uranium Mine

Here is the order in In re Powertech (USA):

in-re-powertech.pdf

News coverage here.