Here are the materials so far in Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. Vanport International, Inc. (D. Or.):
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
News Profile of “Driving While Indian”
Here is “Data from millions of traffic stops reveal there is ‘driving while Indian'”
Nooksack Year-End Update
Here:
Adams v. Whatcom County
Plaintiff sues Whatcom County for Section 1983 civil rights violations associated with her imprisonment pursuant to a Tribal Court arrest warrant.
In re Z.A.G. (state court parenting suit)
Superior Court rules Tribal Court lacks jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.
9-13-19 Child Custody Motion – Adams v. Galindo
10-17-19 Order Granting Motion for Declaratory Relief – Galindo v Adams
Adams v. Dodge (state court tort suit)
Defendant Tribal Court Chief Judge Ray Dodge countersues Plaintiffs for libel.
Adams v. Dodge (Elfo) (federal habeas corpus suit)
Petitioner’s petition for ICRA writ of habeas corpus is amended by stipulation to name Nooksack Tribal Court Respondents, who move to dismiss.
12-0. 9-20-19 Respondents’ Return to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motions for Dismissal
20. 10-16-19 Stipulation and Order
21-0. 10-18-19 Second Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus
Rabang v. Kelly (federal civil RICO suit/appeal)
Ninth Circuit further holds Rabang in abeyance, pending the appeal in Doucette.
Doucette v. Zinke (federal APA suit/appeal)
Plaintiff-Appellants notice their appeal to the Ninth Circuit
Tageant v. Ashby (state court tort suit)
Plaintiff amends her personal capacity suit against Nooksack Police Chief Mike Ashby.
Split Ninth Circuit Panel Affirms Dismissal of Muckleshoot U&A Appeal
Oklahoma SCT Holds Tax on Video Game Machines Used at Cherokee Casinos is Preempted by Federal Law
Little Shell Chippewa Tribe Nears Federal Recognition
Here is news coverage.
Alex Skibine on Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers [now published]
Alex Tallchief Skibine has published “Incorporation Without Assimilation: Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers” in the UCLA Law Review Discourse.
The abstract:
For the last forty years the U.S. Supreme Court has been engaged in a measured attack on the sovereignty of Indian tribes when it comes to tribal court jurisdiction over people who are not members of the tribe asserting that jurisdiction. The U.S. Congress has already enacted legislation partially restoring some tribal courts’ criminal jurisdiction over nonmembers. This Article proposes to legislatively reconfirm the civil jurisdiction of tribal courts over such nonmembers. After examining the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this area and summarizing the Court’s main concerns with such tribal jurisdiction, this Article explores various legislative options before settling on a preferred course of action. The proposal set forth in the last part of this Article would reconfirm tribal court civil jurisdiction over nonmembers provided the tribal courts has established personal jurisdiction over the parties. However, tribal courts’ determinations on this subject would be appealable to federal courts. Furthermore, the Article proposes to allow nonmembers being sued in tribal courts the option of removing their cases to federal courts under certain conditions.
Split Minnesota COA Rejects Treaty Rights Defense in Prosecution for Fishing on Gull Lake by Fond du Lac Member
Here is the unpublished opinion in State v. Northrup:
Split Minnesota COA Panel Affirms Authority of Tribal Police Office Outside Reservation Boundaries Acting under Cross-Dep Agreement
Here is the opinion in State v. Bellcourt:
You must be logged in to post a comment.