Tort Claim against Rincon Casino Operations Dismissed on Tribal Court Exhaustion Grounds

Here are the materials in Butler v. Fortunes Asian Cuisine (S.D. Cal.):

DCT Order on Exhaustion

Rincon Defendants Motion to Dismiss

State Court Complaint

Trademark Trial and Appeals Board Hears Redskins Trademark Challenge

Here are the materials so far in Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc.:

Plaintiffs’ Brief on Laches Issue

Plaintiffs’ Brief on Merits

Defendants’ Brief on Laches Issue

Defendants’ Brief on Merits

Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief on Laches Issue

Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief on Merits

 

 

Walking on Common Ground — New Publications on Tribal Courts & PL 280

Promising Strategies: Tribal State Court Relations
Tribal courts and state courts interact across an array of issues, including child welfare, cross jurisdictional enforcement of domestic violence orders of protection, and civil commitments. Since the early 1990s, initiatives by judges’ organizations within both judicial systems have focused on an agenda of greater mutual understanding and cooperative action. This publication spotlights some of the most successful strategies within these initiatives. Click here to read full document.

Promising Strategies: Public Law 280
In PL 280 jurisdictions, the concurrent jurisdiction of state and tribal courts over criminal prosecutions and civil actions arising in Indian Country creates many interactions and complications. Tribal and state authorities encounter one another across an array of issues, including government-to-government recognition, concurrent jurisdiction, cross-jurisdictional enforcement of domestic violence orders of protection, cross-deputization, and civil commitments. Tensions and misunderstandings have been common features of tribal and state policing relations in the past, sometimes erupting in jurisdictional conflicts. This publication highlights unique ways in which tribal and state jurisdictions have entered into collaborations to overcome barriers to effective justice provision. Click here to read full document.

New Scholarship on Indigenous Decolonization and United Nations Membership

India Reed Bowers has posted “Indigenous Decolonization and United Nations Membership: Indigenous Peoples and the Fundamental Right to Self-Determination” on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This LL.M. thesis provides legal arguments for, amongst other things, the inclusion of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as Members of the United Nations (equal to States, but not required to form States) through an equality- and dignity-based examination of UN Decolonization, ‘friendly relations’, and self-determination. The arguments contained within also provide an examination of the violations of International Law resulting from, amongst other topics addressed, discrimination committed by the United Nations and States against Indigenous and Tribal Peoples via State-Indigenous governing relationships. Limited access to justice and limited actualized rights in regards to Indigenous Peoples’ self-determination are discussed with reference to Tribal/Indigenous/State shared histories, legal personality, the International Court of Justice and judicial procedure and remedy, State anti-discrimination laws, the UN and its relationship to international trade and business, the codification of international human rights and criminal law, mental health (with special attention to high Indigenous suicide rates in ‘developed’ States, colonialism and discrimination), current UN definitions of ‘aggression’, ‘war’, ‘colonialism’ and ‘conflict’ (with suggestions of definition revisions), State abuse towards Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, segregation and exclusion, and apartheid and cultural genocide as resulting from State-Indigenous inequality as experienced by Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. UN definitions of ‘development’ are challenged and held accountable for cultural discrimination and death. Recommendations with an emphasis on healing include amendment of the UN Charter and suggested General Assembly Resolutions, as well as equal international leadership opportunity for traditional and chosen Indigenous and Tribal legal and governing cultures, subsistence-based lifeways and traditional Indigenous and Tribal healers with a focus on the right to cultural integrity, traditional Indigenous and Tribal lands, including the right to say ‘no’ to non-native land-grabbing, resource exploitation and State abuses. The argument that State territorial integrity includes Indigenous and Tribal traditional lands is also countered. The original version of this LL.M. thesis was submitted to the Master’s of Law program ‘International Law of Human Rights and Criminal Justice’ at Utrecht University, the Netherlands, 22 August 2012. This online version was uploaded 5 March 2013.

Sen. Feinstein Introduces Tribal Gaming Eligibility Act

Congressional Record link here. Bill text not yet available.

By Mrs. FEINSTEIN:

S. 477. A bill to amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to modify a provision relating to gaming on land acquired after October 17, 1988; to the Committee on Indian Affairs.

Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I rise today to reintroduce the Tribal Gaming Eligibility Act.

This bill sets forth what I believe is a very reasonable, moderate standard for where tribes are allowed to open gaming establishments.

The standard is simple: a tribe must demonstrate that it has a modern and an aboriginal connection to the land before it can open a gaming establishment on it. Continue reading →

Poarch Band of Creek Indians Announces Summer Law Internship Program

2013 Summer Law Internship Program

The Poarch Band of Creek Indians Legal Department is establishing a summer internship program for law students with an interest in learning about the legal issues that face a federally recognized tribe.  This internship will offer the opportunity to obtain practical knowledge and experience regarding both tribal and federal Indian law.

Under this Program, a law student will assist the Attorney General or any designated supervising attorney in providing legal services and representation to the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, its Tribal Council, its Tribal boards/committees, its Tribal Government, and its Tribal authorities, commissions, enterprises, and other entities in a broad variety of matters, including, but not limited to, contracts, employment issues, administrative matters, real estate matters, Indian gaming, taxation, tribal jurisdiction, environmental law, cultural resource preservation, criminal matters, child welfare, and legislation.  The internship will last six weeks during the summer of 2013.  A stipend will be paid to the selected candidate.

Applications are due by close of business on April 19, 2013.  The selected candidate will be informed by April 26, 2013.

To apply, please submit the following to the Legal Department by personal delivery, e-mail to glangham@pci-nsn.gov, or fax to (251) 368-1610, by the deadline:

(1)               A cover letter;

(2)               A current resume; and

(3)               A copy of your transcript.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

In order to be eligible for selection and participation, an applicant must meet the following requirements at the time the internship begins and for the duration of the internship:

(1)               Must be currently enrolled at an accredited law school and submit official transcript for the 2011-12 academic year prior to the start of the internship.

(2)               Must provide legal proof of authorization to work in the United States.

(3)               Must not currently be subject to any disciplinary action by any institution or entity, including, but not limited to, any education or law enforcement agency.

(4)               Must possess a high level of maturity with the ability to work with and maintain confidential information.

(5)               Must possess a valid state driver’s license.

Please call or e-mail any questions to Gia Langham, Legal Executive Assistant, at (251) 368-9136 Ext. 2525 or glangham@pci-nsn.gov.

PREFERENCE SHALL BE GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TRIBAL EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE

THE TRIBE ADHERES TO A DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY

Brian Pierson on Wisconsin Indian Treaty Rights and Proposed Mining Activities

Here.

An excerpt:

The Wisconsin Legislature has approved amendments to Wisconsin law intended to pave the way for Gogebic Taconite to mine iron ore in the Penokee Hills of Ashland County. Wisconsin’s tribes have been outspoken in their opposition. The Bad River Chippewa, whose reservation lies directly in the path of any mine runoff, has been especially vocal.

The six Chippewa tribes have asserted that their treaties with the federal government give them special status and entitle their concerns to greater weight. They are right.

By the 1842 treaty at La Pointe, the Chippewa ceded to the United States approximately 12 million acres, including the Penokee Hills, receiving in return an amount that the Indian Claims Commission later called “unconscionable.” A treaty, the Supreme Court observed in United States vs. Winans, is “not a grant of rights to the Indians, but a grant of right from them – a reservation of those not granted.” In the 1842 treaty, the Chippewa reserved “usufructuary” rights in the territory they ceded, including the right to hunt, fish, trap, harvest wild rice and engage in other activities to make a living from the land.

LTBB Chair Dexter McNamara Will Sign Same-Sex Marriage Ordinance on March 15, 2013

From his email to the tribal employees and news outlets:

Our constitution under ARTICLE II ” INDIVIDUAL RIGHT ” reads, The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, in exercising powers of self governance, shall NOT deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws or deprive any person of liberty or property without due process of law.

Also in our Constitution under ARTICLE VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE GOVERNMENT A. PURPOSE, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. We, the Little Traverese Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, speak through this document to assert that we are a distinct nation of Anishinaabek of North America that possess the right to : self-determination; freely determine our political status; freely pursue our economic, social, religious and cultural development, and determine our membership, without external interference. These same rights and principles the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians acknowledge to be inherent among other peoples, nations and governments throughout the world. We recognize their sovereignty and pledge to maintain relations with those peoples, nations and governments who acknowledge those same fundamental human rights and principles, and who recognize the sovereighty of the Little Traverese Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.

As the Chairman of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians I will sign the Same Sex Marriage Statute on Friday March 15, 2013 @ 10:00 A.M. in the Chairmans office.

I believe that Tribal Citizens who wish to choose same sex marriage should be treated and just as importantly as any other Tribal Citizen who are Man and Woman. This is about people being happy. This is a real Issue. We are private people and we need to recognize on how we wish to live our lives. I have heard from Tribal Citizens, and not once have I heard that this could bring injury to our Nation, and that was the biggest issue that I had concerns of. There should not be a dividing line and we should all be able to seek a good life.

Migwech…

Biden and Obama Remarks at VAWA Signing Ceremony

Highlight quote from the President:

Tribal governments have an inherent right to protect their people, and all women deserve the right to live free from fear. And that is what today is all about.

2:16 P.M. EST

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Diane. Thank you. (Applause.) Continue reading →

Arizona COA Briefs in ISDEAA Tribal Immunity Case — Case to Watch

Here are the available briefs in Shirk v. Lancaster:

Lancaster et at Opening Brief

Navajo Nation Amicus Brief

GRIC Amicus Brief

Shirk Answering Brief

Shirk Response to GRIC Amicus

Lancaster et al Reply

Lower court materials here. Materials in related case against City of Chandler here. Here are the materials in the federal case dismissing a Federal Tort Claims Act action.