From Yale Climate Connections, “By paying attention, tribes in the Northwoods are leading the way on climate change.”
Environmental
Commentary on COVID and Access to Safe Drinking Water in Indian Country
From Cynthis Harris, here is “Disparity, Disease, and Drinking Water: COVID-19 and Safe Drinking Water Access in Indian Country.”
Ninth Circuit Briefs on Chilkat Indian Village v. BLM
NYTs News Profile on the Yakama Nation’s Fisheries
Fort Peck Tribe Sues Interior over Keystone XL Pipeline
Here is the complaint in Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Mont.):
Federal Court Turns Down Yurok Effort to Enjoin Federal Action Threatening Salmon
Here are the materials in Yurok Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation (N.D. Cal.):
914 Klamath Water District Amicus Brief
917 Klamath Water Users Opposition
Prior post here.
Final Claim against Grand Canyon Uranium Mine Rejected
Here are the materials in Grand Canyon Trust v. Provencio (D. Ariz.):
226 Enviros Motion for Summary J
233-1 Energy Motion for Summary J
234-1 Federal Motion for Summary J
Prior post here.
Quinault Indian Nation Comments on Chehalis River Dam Project
Here.
Jim Grijalva on the Gap in Indian Country Water Quality Protection
James Grijalva has posted “Ending the Interminable Gap in Indian Country Water Quality Protection,” forthcoming in the Harvard Environmental Law Review, on SSRN.
The abstract:
Tribal self-determination in modern environmental law holds the tantalizing prospect of translating Indigenous environmental value judgments into legally enforceable requirements of federal regulatory programs. Congress authorized this approach three decades ago, but few tribes have sought primacy even for foundational programs like Clean Water Act water quality standards, contributing to potentially serious environmental injustices. This article analyzes in detail EPA’s recent attempt at reducing tribal barriers — reinterpreting the Act as a congressional delegation of tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians — and the early indications its results are insignificant. The article then proposes an unconventional solution ostensibly at odds with tribal self-determination: promulgation of national, federal water quality standards for Indian country. EPA’s Indian Program actually began this way, as an interim step awaiting tribes’ assumption of federal regulatory programs. Thirty years later, the seemingly interminable regulatory gap in Indian country water quality protection remains, and EPA has a legal and moral responsibility to close it.
Popular Science: “The Great Lakes are higher than they’ve ever been, and we’re not sure what will happen next”
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.