Here:
San Paqual Band v California Complaint
Here:
Here:
Here is that order:
DCT Order Granting Kansas Motion to Intervene
The complaint is here.
The D.C. District Court previously granted the US motion to transfer the venue to the District of Kansas:
I’ve posted my short paper, “California v. Cabazon Band: A Quarter-Century of Complex, Litigious Self-Determination,” in this month’s Federal Lawyer on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
The Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), may be the most momentous decision in federal Indian law in the last 50 years. The decision provided a federal common law basis for Indian tribes to engage in high stakes bingo and other gaming activities without state regulation, even in so-called Public Law 280 states like California that have criminal jurisdiction inside of Indian country. Cabazon Band provoked Congress to finally codify a regulatory scheme for Indian gaming, including an enactment that authorized under specific conditions Vegas-style casino gaming, in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. Indian gaming, as a direct result of Cabazon Band, now has a market greater than $26 billion a year nationally.
Here is the complaint in Saybrook Tax Exempt Investors LLC v. Lake of the Torches Economic Development Corp. (W.D. Wis.):
Saybrook Federal Court Complaint
The state court complaint is here.
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash (D. N.M.):
Party Defendants Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials in the state supreme court decision that is the subject of this challenge.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.