San Pasqual Band Seeks $200 Million from State of California in Gaming Compact Breach Suit

Here:

San Paqual Band v California Complaint

Federal Government Reply Brief in Salazar v. Patchak

Here:

11-247rbUS

Gun Lake Band Reply Brief in Patchak

Here:

11-246 & 11-247 rb

Federal Court Grants Kansas Motion to Intervene in Wyandotte v. Salazar Gaming Case

Here is that order:

DCT Order Granting Kansas Motion to Intervene

The complaint is here.

The D.C. District Court previously granted the US motion to transfer the venue to the District of Kansas:

DCT Order Granting US Motion to Transfer Venue to D. Kan.

Fletcher on Cabazon Band in the Federal Lawyer

I’ve posted my short paper, “California v. Cabazon Band: A Quarter-Century of Complex, Litigious Self-Determination,” in this month’s Federal Lawyer on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

The Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), may be the most momentous decision in federal Indian law in the last 50 years. The decision provided a federal common law basis for Indian tribes to engage in high stakes bingo and other gaming activities without state regulation, even in so-called Public Law 280 states like California that have criminal jurisdiction inside of Indian country. Cabazon Band provoked Congress to finally codify a regulatory scheme for Indian gaming, including an enactment that authorized under specific conditions Vegas-style casino gaming, in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. Indian gaming, as a direct result of Cabazon Band, now has a market greater than $26 billion a year nationally.

Investors Sue LDF Lake of the Torches EDC Again (This Time in Federal Court)

Here is the complaint in Saybrook Tax Exempt Investors LLC v. Lake of the Torches Economic Development Corp. (W.D. Wis.):

Saybrook Federal Court Complaint

The state court complaint is here.

Federal Court Allows Pueblo of Santa Ana’s Challenge to N.M. Gaming Compact’s Jurisdiction Shifting Provisions to Proceed

Here are the materials in Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash (D. N.M.):

Memo Opinion

Party Defendants Motion to Dismiss

Judge Nash Motion to Dismiss

Response to Party Defendants

Response to Judge Nash

Party Defendants Reply

Judge Nash Reply

Here are the materials in the state supreme court decision that is the subject of this challenge.

Opening Ninth Circuit Briefs in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

Here:

California Brief

Big Lagoon Brief

IPR on Proposal to Add More Casinos in Michigan

Here.

ALJ Rules against Saginaw Chippewa in NLRB Jurisdiction Case

Here:

Administrative Law Judge’s Decision