Here:
Questions presented:
Whether Rule 19 requires dismissal of APA suits challenging federal agency action whenever a nonparty who benefited from that action asserts sovereign immunity.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in State of California v. Dept. of the Interior (N.D. Cal.):
Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):
16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene
29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions
31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition
Prior post here.
Here are the materials so far in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):
Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):
Here is the news coverage. We posted the complaint in 2016.
Here are some additional materials in what is now captioned Gopher v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. that detail the issues at trial:
Plaintiffs Motion for Directed Verdict
Wells Fargo Motion for Directed Verdict
Here is the brief in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Burgam:
Cert petition here.
Here is the complaint in Lytton Rancheria of California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Here are updated materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.