Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):
16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene
29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions
31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition
Prior post here.

Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):
16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene
29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions
31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition
Prior post here.

Here are the materials so far in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. New York State Gaming Commission (N.D. N.Y.):

Here is the news coverage. We posted the complaint in 2016.
Here are some additional materials in what is now captioned Gopher v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. that detail the issues at trial:
Plaintiffs Motion for Directed Verdict
Wells Fargo Motion for Directed Verdict

Here is the brief in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Burgam:
Cert petition here.
Here is the complaint in Lytton Rancheria of California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

Here are updated materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.

Here is the complaint in Wintu Tribe of Northern California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

Here is the complaint in State of Alaska v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

Here are the materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
28 Motion to Disqualify Jenner
40-1 Coquille Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Jenner
51 Federal Opposition to TRO Motion
52 Coquille Opposition to TRO Motion
Jan. 22, 2025: MINUTE ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held on this date, (1) Plaintiffs’ 28 Motion to Disqualify Keither Harper and Jenner & Block is denied; (2) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Intervene and 33 Renewed Motion to Intervene are granted; (3) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Expedite is denied as moot; and (4) the parties’ 40 , 41 motions to seal are denied and the Clerk of Court shall unseal those docket entries. Further, by January 24, 2025, Plaintiffs shall file all materials submitted for in camera review on the public docket. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/22/2025. (lcapm3) (Entered: 01/22/2025)

You must be logged in to post a comment.