Here:
Lower court materials here.
Indian gaming
D.C. Circuit Briefs in Sault Tribe Mandatory Trust Land Acquisition Dispute
Here are the briefs (so far) in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt:
Nottawaseppi Huron Band Potawatomi + Saginaw Chippewa Brief
Lower court materials here.
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians’ Muskegon Co. Casino Project EIS Available
Here.
Flandreau Santee Sioux Prevails at Trial on State Tax of Non-Indian Gaming Contractors
Here are the materials in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Terwilliger (D.S.D.):
On remand from the Eighth Circuit here.
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas Cert Petition
Here:
Question presented:
Whether the Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the Act’s legislative history, and this Court’s holding in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), or whether the Fifth Circuit’s decision affirming Ysleta I correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Federal Court Rejects Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Intervention in Scotts Valley Band Pomo Indian Lands Case
Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
17-1 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion to Intervene
Complaint posted here.
New Mexico COA Certifies Tribal Gaming/Immunity Cases to New Mexico SCT
Here is the order in Sipp v. Buffalo Thunder Inc.:
36924 and 38636 Certification Order (FINAL)
The question certified:
[W]hether the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721 (2018), permits tribes and states to contract in Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compacts to shift jurisdiction over certain matters to state courts.
Connecticut, Pequot, and Mohegan Allowed to Intervene and Assert Rule 19 Defense in MGM Challenge to Gaming Compacts
Here are the materials so far in MGM Resorts Global Development LLC v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
24-1 State & Tribal Sovereigns Motion to Intervene
27 MGM Response to Motion to Dismiss
33 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
34 MGM Opposition to Motion to Intervene
36 Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
38 DCT Order Granting Motion to Intervene
We posted the complaint here.
Ninth Circuit Rejects Challenge to Jamul Indian Village Gaming Ops
Here is the opinion in Jamul Action Committee v. Simermeyer.
Briefs here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.