Here is the opinion in White v. Scheiderman.
Briefs:
native outlet motion for leave to appeal
Here are the materials in Delebreau v. Danforth (E.D. Wis.):
Here:
Question presented:
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the District Court’s confirmation and enforcement of the Arbitrator’s Award pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq.
UPDATE:
New York Times Op-Ed:
“Small-scale distilling is a booming business, providing much-needed jobs and revenue for state and local governments. So why are Indian tribes legally prevented from joining in?”
Op-ed is HERE.
Here is the opinion in United States v. Jim.
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in Rucker v. Fasano:
An excerpt:
No love is lost between romance novelists Kelly Rucker and Donna Fasano, who each wrote a tale of a wealthy teenage girl who falls in love with a boy of Native American heritage and becomes pregnant, before they are cruelly parted. To the reader’s relief, however, in each book the lovers are reunited years later, and they rekindle their fiery romance while their child explores his indigenous heritage with his father’s guidance. The characters’ happy endings, however, did not extend to the authors, who each claim to have conceived the story first. Rucker sued Fasano and her publishers for copyright infringement. In this appeal challenging the district court’s entry of summary judgment for the defendants, Rucker contends that disputes of material fact exist regarding Fasano’s access to Rucker’s story and the similarities between the two works. We affirm the judgment.
Story is HERE.
Here is the complaint in Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation (N.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in United States v. Washington subproceeding 18-02 (W.D. Wash.), aka Swinomish Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Tribe:
You must be logged in to post a comment.