Ok, so it’s just one brief so far….
Here:
Lower court materials here.
Supreme Court
Dakota Access LLC v. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Cert Petition [Updated with additional cert stage briefs]
Here:
Questions presented:
- Whether, under NEPA, an agency that carefully considers all criticisms of its environmental analysis must also “resolve” those criticisms to the court’s satisfaction to justify a finding of no significant impact; and
- Whether procedural error under NEPA per se warrants remand with vacatur.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Native America Calling: Monday, September 20, 2021 – ICWA: Federal protections for children under constant legal pressure
Here.
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas Cert Stage Supplemental Briefs
Grand River Six Nations Enterprises Ltd. v. Boughton Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether Connecticut impermissibly regulates or controls conduct beyond the boundaries of the State in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors doing no business in Connecticut and having no nexus with Connecticut.
2. Whether Connecticut violates Due Process protections when it bans a manufacturer’s products from being sold in the state, if the manufacturer fails to obtain and provide to Connecticut private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors relating to their distribution of products in jurisdictions other than Connecticut.
3. Whether Connecticut violates the Supremacy Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors who conduct no business in Connecticut nor distribute the manufacturer’s products to, or in, Connecticut.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
State of Oklahoma v. Kepler Cert Petition [Request to Overrule McGirt]
Here:
Question presented:
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Lower court materials (Kepler v. State):
Oklahoma v. Bosse Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether a State may impose procedural or equitable bars to postconviction relief on the claim that the State lacked prosecutorial authority because the crime of conviction occurred in Indian country.
2. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
3. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Lower court materials here.
Tulsa Law Review Symposium on McGirt
Here:
Introduction
Mary Kathryn Nagle
The Past May Be Prologue, But It Does Not Dictate Our Future: This Is the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s Table
Jonodev Chaudhuri
Reflections on McGirt v. Oklahoma: A Case Team Perspective
Riyaz Kanji, David Giampetroni, and Philip Tinker
The Indian Treaty Canon and McGirt v. Oklahoma: Righting the Ship
Lauren King
A Wealth of Sovereign Choices: Tax Implications of McGirt v. Oklahoma and the Promise of Tribal Economic Development
Stacy Leeds and Lonnie Beard
The Sky Will Not Fall in Oklahoma
Clint Summers
Casenote/Comment
A Coherent Ethic of Lawyering in Post-McGirt Oklahoma
Julie Combs
Other
Reclaiming Our Reservation: Mvskoke Tvstvnvke Hoktvke Tuccenet (Etem) Opunayakes
Sarah Deer
WaPo: “Native voters are clearing hurdles. That’s why some politicians want to make them higher.”
Here.
Guy Charles and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer on the Voting Rights Case
Here is “The Court’s Voting-Rights Decision Was Worse Than People Think,” in the Atlantic.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.