Here is the complaint in Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Beccera (E.D. Cal.):

Here is the complaint in Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Beccera (E.D. Cal.):

Here are the updated materials in Cherokee Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
111 Federal Objection to Magistrate Report
Prior post here.

Here are the updated materials in Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Prior post here.

This paragraph is brutal:
The evidence presented to the Court at trial was “both overwhelming and extremely underwhelming.” (Tr. Court, 1426:20). Witness testimony was poignant at times, on one occasion moving some in the courtroom audience to tears. Ultimately, however, the Tribe failed to shoulder its burden of proof; and despite the Court’s serious misgivings about the treatment of the Tribe, the Tribe did not show that the United States’ failure to repair the crumbling Building violated trust obligations or constituted to a taking. Even if the Tribe met the elements of a breach of trust or takings claim, its proof of damages was entirely unconvincing, dependent on construction costs in the city limits of Chicago and rental values derived from cursory internet searches. Accordingly, the United States is entitled to judgment.
Here are materials in Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States (S.D. Cal.):
Doc 404 Findings Conclusion and Order
Prior post here.

Here is the consent decree in United States v. General Recycling of Washington LLC (W.D. Wash.):

Here is the opinion in Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. United States.
Briefs:
Lower court materials here.

Here are the materials so far in Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

Here is the complaint in Native Village of Unalakleet v. United States Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utility Service (D. Alaska):

You must be logged in to post a comment.