Here is the order in Woods v. Nunn:
Tenth Circuit Dismisses Non-Indian Habeas Petition Inspired by McGirt
Here is the order in Woods v. Nunn:
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas Background Materials
Merits Stage
Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Amicus Brief
Cert Stage
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo’s Cert Petition
Reply of petitioners Ysleta del Sur Pueblo
Brief amicus curiae of United States in favor of SCOTUS review
Fifth Circuit
Texas v Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 5th Circuit Opinion
Alabama-Coushatta Tribe Amicus Brief
District Court
54 tribe supplemental memo re cause of action
83 Tribe Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
97 Texas Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
121 First Amended Counterclaims
146 Texas Motion for Summary Judgment
147 Texas AG Motion for Summary Judgment
153 Tribe Response to Texas AG
Denezpi v. United States Background Materials
Merits Stage Materials
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Amicus Brief
Tribal Governments Amicus Brief
Cert Stage Materials
United States’ Brief in Opposition
Tenth Circuit Materials
United States v Denezpi Tenth Circuit Opinion
District Court Materials
1-1 Criminal Information Sheet
32 DCT Order Denying Motion to Dismiss on Double Jeopardy Grounds
California COA Affirms Dismissal of State Court Employment Suit against Umatilla
Materials in Tribal Business Partner’s Fraud/RICO Suit against MHA Nation
Here are the materials so far in Bird Industries Inc. v. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (D.S.D.):
LTBB v. Whitmer Cert Petition
Here:
Question presented:
Whether the 1855 Treaty of Detroit established a federal reservation for the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians?
Lower court materials here.
Call for Submissions by the Indigenous People’s Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance
Call for Submissions for Volume VIII
Deadline: January 15th, 2022
The Indigenous People’s Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance is soliciting scholarly articles and student comments written about legal issues important to Indigenous communities in the United States and throughout the world, as well as works by artists that relate to or comment on legal issues. We also seek works on issues or aspects of life in Native communities that are impacted by law, whether tribal law or the laws of nation-states.
If you would like to submit a full-length submission for consideration, please email it to ipjlcr@lawnet.ucla.edu with the subject line “Volume VIII Submission” before January 15th, 2022. If you wish to submit an abstract first, please do so before December 15th, 2021.
Find out more at https://law.ucla.edu/academics/journals/indigenous-peoples-journal-law-culture-and-resistance
Please follow all of these guidelines as applicable to your submission (e.g. a poem will not likely need Bluebook citations). Each submission should be sent as one Microsoft Word file with Bluebook formatted citations (21st ed. 2020). Brief bios are required, as well as 12 pt. Times New Roman typed font, paginated, and should include: your name, address, phone number, and email address in the header of the first page.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at <ipjlcr@lawnet.ucla.edu>.
University of Washington 34th Annual Indian Law Symposium: Restatement of the Law of American Indians
Here.
UW Law’s Indian Law Symposium, an annual tradition for 34 years, will be held in two parts for the 2021-2022 academic year.
Part 1 was held on Friday, October 1, 2021 and featured a full set of topics from panelists across the country.
Part 2 will be held on April 21 and 22, 2022 and will focus exclusively on the forthcoming Restatement of The Law of American Indians. The presenters will all be from the group of experts who participated in the drafting of the Restatement. The event will be cosponsored with the Washington Law Review and supported by the American Law Institute.
We will be requesting 13.5 Law & Legal CLE credits total for Part 2 of the 34th Annual Indian Law Symposium.
Tanner v. Cayuga Nation Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. In view of Sherrill, whether New York tribes exercise “concurrent” jurisdiction over fee lands within the plenary taxing and regulatory authority of the state and local governments, thereby enabling those tribes to engage in gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), and cause the same or greater disruptions of settled expectations condemned by this Court in Sherrill.
2. Whether fee lands under plenary state and local taxation and regulation (per Sherrill) constitute “Indian lands” under IGRA because those lands are located within the Cayugas’ historic reservation.
3. Whether the Cayuga Nation’s ancient reservation was disestablished.
Lower court materials here.
Oklahoma Federal Court Dismisses Nonmember Company’s Objection to Tribal Court Jurisdiction
Here are the materials in Monster Tech. Group v. Eller (W.D. Okla.):
1-3 Iowa Tribal Court Injunction
5 DCT Order Dismissing Complaint without Prejudice
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.