Here are the materials in Mattwaoshshe v. United States (D.D.C.):
1 Complaint
36-1 US Motion to Dismiss
38-1 Soldier Creek Wind Motion to Dismiss
39-1 Nextera Energy Motion to Dismiss
40-1 Westar Energy Motion to Dismiss
44 Opposition
48 Soldier Creek Opposition
49 Nextera Reply
50 Westar Reply
51 US Reply
60 DCT Order
Not that it would matter much in this issue, but I can’t help but point out of the more anomalously interpreted Indian law statutes of all time is briefly discussed in this opinion. Here is the law, 25 U.S.C. sec. 175:
In all States and Territories where there are reservations or allotted Indians the United States attorney shall represent them in all suits at law and in equity.
Seems pretty clear, eh? No chance. 🙂 Yet another example of the word “shall” being interpreted as the exact opposite of its meaning. . . .
You must be logged in to post a comment.