Here.
Srsly, you know by now I’m no Andrew Jackson fan.
Here.
Srsly, you know by now I’m no Andrew Jackson fan.
Download(PDF): MILS_Spring_2017_newsletter
Here are the materials in United States v. Walsh (D. Ariz.):
Here:
153 ACOE Motion Extend Time to Resp to Mtn Part SJ
154 SRST Resp to 153 ACOE Mtn Ext Time
155 Vance Reply to DAPL & ACOE Opp to Mtn Intervene
160 ACOE Unoppoed Mtn to Ext Time
161 DAPL Reply to Opp to Mtn Prot Ord
162 Motion for Leave to File Perry Declaration
163 DAPL Response to SRST Mtn for Leave to File Perry Declaration
165 Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
167 Transmission of Notice, Order & Docket to CA
168 DAPL Opposition to Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
170 ACOE Opposition to CRST Motion for Injunction
171 Order Denying CRST Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal
172 ACOE Opp to SRST Mtn for PSJ & Cross Mtfor PSJ
Here are the materials in Austin v. Dietz (D. Utah):
12-2 Motion to Dismiss First Tribal Court Suit
12-3 Motion to Dismiss Second Tribal Court Suit
12-4 Tribal Court Panel Decision
The State of Michigan has filed a lawsuit against the Hannahville Indian Community. The State is asserting that the Hannahville Indian Community’s class III gaming compact has expired (the agreement was executed in 1993).
A copy of the complaint is here:Hannahville Complaint
Hannahville’s Class III gaming compact is here: Hannahville Class III Compact
The Hannahville Compact is one of seven tribal-state gaming compacts the State of Michigan executed in 1993 – all for the same term of years. The State has argued that six of those agreements expired in 2013, but this is the first lawsuit it has filed.
The State’s complaint is likely to be dismissed on the basis of tribal sovereign immunity, but the timing of this lawsuit – just two months into the Trump Administration – may signal a larger effort to appeal to the Federal Government exert pressure on the Michigan tribes who have similar gaming compacts. It is unclear whether the State intends to file similar lawsuits against the other tribes with 1993 gaming compacts.
My earlier commentary on the 1993 compacts is here and here (which includes a discussion over whether Michigan’s 1993 gaming compacts have expired)
Here are the materials in State of Minnesota v. Northrup:
Order – Jurisdiction Questioned
Memorandum – Informal – Respondent
Memorandum – Informal – Appellant
Order – Dismiss – Not Stipulated, Entire Case
News coverage here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.