Here are the materials in Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
158 DCT Order on Motions to Strike
Briefs are here.
Here are the materials in Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
158 DCT Order on Motions to Strike
Briefs are here.
Here are the materials in Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
45 Quicken Loans Motion to Dismiss
46 Umpqua Bank Motion to Dismiss
50-1 Cornerstone Motion to Dismiss
53-1 Associated Pension Motion to Dismiss
54-1 Garth Moore Insurance Motion to Dismiss
67 Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Stay
72-10 Plaintiffs Motion for PI
73 Plaintiffs Opposition to Motions to Dismiss
87 Crosby Opposition to Motion for PI
91 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of Motion for PI
Complaint here.
Here are the materials in Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County (E.D. Cal.):
14 Inyo County Motion to Dismiss
15-1 Inyo County Motion to Dismiss
16-1 Inyo County Motion to Dismiss
We posted the complaint here.
Here are the materials in the matter captioned by the court Citizens for a Better Way v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
98-1 UAIC Motion for Summary J
99-1 Citizens for a Better Way Motion for Summary J
102-1 Colusa Motion for Summary J
119-1 Enterprise Rancheria Motion for Summary J
120-1 Enterprise Rancheria Motion to Strike Guerrero Dec
121-1 Enterprise Rancheria Motion to Strike Meister Dec
126 UAIC Opposition to Summary J Motion
127 UAIC Opposition to Motion to Strike
128 Citizens for a Better Way Opposition to Summary J Motion
130 Colusa Opposition to Summary J Motion
131 Colusa Opposition to Motion to Strike
135 US Reply re Motion to Strike
136 Enterprise Rancheria Reply re Summary J Motion
137 Enterprise Rancheria Reply re Motion to Strike Guerrero
138 Enterprise Rancheria Reply re Motion to Strike Meister
158 DCT Order Granting Motions to Strike
Materials in the TRO stage of this litigation are here.
Here are the materials in Boricchio v. Chicken Ranch Casino (E.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Rosales v. Dutschke (E.D. Cal.):
An excerpt:
Plaintiffs, WALTER ROSALES and KAREN TOGGERY are Native American residents of San Diego County of one-half or more degree of California Indian blood, and former leaders of the half-blood Indian community, known as the Jamul Indian Village, “JIV,” who until recently lived on the Indian cemetery in Jamul, where their families have lived since the late 1800’s. Rosales and Toggery own and control their families’ human remains and funerary objects that were interred in burial sites below, on, and above the Indian cemetery. Those remains and objects have been feloniously disinterred and desecrated by the Defendants in a race to illegally build a casino on the U.S. government’s portion of the Indian cemetery property before they are stopped and the law is enforced.
Here is the order in the case now captioned Jamul Action Committee v. Chaudhuri (E.D. Cal.):
93 DCT Order Denying Injunction
Pleadings and prior orders here.
Here are the materials in Blue Lake Rancheria v. Lanier (E.D. Cal.):
82-1 Blue Lake Motion for Summary J
Here are the new materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Chaudhuri (E.D. Cal.):
60-1 Jamul Action Committee Motion for PI
62 Tribal Opposition to Motion for PI
63 NIGC Opposition to Motion for PI
67 Jamul Action Committee Reply
75-1 Rosales & Toggery Motion to File Amicus
75-2 Rosales & Toggery Amicus Brief
You must be logged in to post a comment.