Materials in KPMG LLP v. Kanam

Here, filed in the District of Alaska, and now apparently pending in the Ninth Circuit:

4 KPMG Motion for PI

29 DCT Order Granting KPMG Motion for PI

36 KPMG Motion for Summary J

42 DCT Order Denying Removal

43 Kanam “Notice of Mootness”

44 KPMG Reply

50 DCT Order

 

More “Karluk Tribal Court”/”Karluk Supreme Court” Nonsense

Here are the materials in Remenar v. Office of Dana Scarp (D. D.C.), where the court dismissed a mandamus petition of a non-lawyer seeking admission to practice claiming to be licensed by the fake “Karluk Tribal Court” out of Washington state (not to be confused with the federally recognized Indian nation in Alaska):

Petition for Mandamus Relief

Judge Leon Opinion

And here are materials in Mr. Remenar’s criminal case in Texas:

State of Texas v. Remenar Removal Petition

Remand

We’ve posted materials on the people claiming to represent this fake tribal court and fake tribe here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Ninth Circuit Dismisses Appeal of Fake Indians and Fake Indian Court

Here are the materials in Koniag Inc v. Kanam:

Unpublished CA9 Memorandum

3 Order to Show Cause

5 Kanam Response

6 Koniag Response

8 Order Setting Briefing Schedule

9-1 Koniag Motion for Reconsideration

10 Kanam Opening “Breif”

13 Order Denying Motion

19-1 Koniag Answer Brief

26-1 Kanam Reply

Lower court materials here, here, here, and here.

Fake Indian Alert: Federal Complaint by “Chief” of Nonrecognized Tribe

Here is the complaint in Riggin v. Woodward (D. Colo.):

1 Complaint

The complaint includes the following text:

This case has been properly removed to the Karluk Tribal court, as Mr. Riggin is a tribal member and the Chief, of the KiKiallus Indian Nation. Per the Point Elliot Treaty of 1855, he is granted among other things, the right to hunt for game, and sovereign immunity. These treaty rights have been violated and ignored by the Jefferson County Courts, thus giving the United States District Court original jurisdiction over this action.

We’ve posted on the nonrecognized Washington state tribe, “KiKiallus Indian Nation,” and the use/abuse by its alleged members of an entity known as the “Karluk Tribal court” here, here, here, here, and here.

Oklahoma Company Sues Kurt Kanam/Kurt Weinreich (Fake Indian “Judge”)

Here are the materials in Unit Corp. v. TMI Ministries (W.D. Okla.):

1 Complaint + Exhibits

5 Motion for TRO + Exhibits

8 DCT Order Granting TRO

News coverage here.

We’ve posted about the Kurt Kanam frauds here, here and here.

Federal Court Enjoins Actions of Fake Tribal Court Harassing Native Village Corporation

Here are the materials in Koniag, Inc. v. Kanam (D. Alaska):

DCT Order Granting PI

Koniag Motion for PI

Kanam Opposition

Koniag Reply

We posted previously on this case here, here, and here.

More Materials on Koniag v. Kanum

Here is a complaint filed by Kurt Kanam against the parties in United States v. Washington in the “Karluk Tribal Court” from last fall:

Kanam v All Fish Case Parties, Complaint 11-19-2011

Update in Koniag v. Kanam — Some Evidence that “Karluk Tribal Court” Isn’t a Real Tribal Court At All

You may recall our posting on the recent complaint in Koniag, Inc. v. Kanam (and the Karluk Tribal Court). There is some evidence that the “Karluk Tribal Court” is not attached to a federally recognized tribe, and may be a total fraud.

Here are some additional materials in the ongoing federal suit:

Koniag Motion for TRO

Karluk Tribal Court Materials [Note the location of the tribal court — it’s in Washington state, a thousand miles from the Native village on Kodiak Island]

First Amended Complaint

Here is an order issued by the “Karluk Tribal Court” purporting to declare a Washington state court ICWA proceeding invalid: Continue reading