Here is the order list from last Friday.
Here are the cert stage materials in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Lundgren.
Lower court materials here.
Rule 19
Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. Barboan Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Does 25 U.S.C. § 357 authorize a condemnation action against a parcel of allotted land in which an Indian tribe has a fractional beneficial interest, especially where (a) the the tribe holds less than a majority interest, (b) the purpose of condemnation is to maintain a long-standing right-of-way for a public utility, and (c) the statute was not “passed for the benefit of dependent Indian tribes.” Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United States, 248 U.S. 78, 89 (1918)?
2. If 25 U.S.C. § 357 authorizes such a condemnation action, may the action move forward if the Indian tribe invokes sovereign immunity and cannot be joined as a party to the action?
Lower court materials here.
St. Regis Mohawk Brief in Patent Litigation
Here is the brief in the matter captioned Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Allergan Inc.:
Federal Court Declines to Stay Mandate in Effort to Condemn Navajo Lands Saying Utility Loses Even if SCOTUS Reverses
Here are the materials in Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Approximately 15.49 Acres of Land in McKinley County (D.N.M.):
142 Motion to Confirm Stay Order
Prior posts here.
Federal Court Dismisses Effort to Shut Down Indian Casino Project Allegedly Built on Indian Cemetery
Here are the materials in Rosales v. Dutschke (E.D. Cal.):
62-1 Tribally Related Defendants Motion to Dismiss
Tenth Circuit Briefs in Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town v. United States
Federal Dismisses Contract Action under Rule 19 for Failure to Join Tuba City Regional Healthcare Corp.
Here are the materials in LDFS LLC v. IEC Group Incorporated (D. Ariz.):
Washington COA Dismisses Two Challenges to Swinomish Civil Forfeiture under Rule 19
Here is the unpublished opinion in Washington v. Director of the Dept. of Licensing.
An excerpt:
After losing her vehicle to the Swinomish Tribe in civil forfeiture, Washington filed this suit against the Department of Licensing and unnamed Swinomish police officers. The trial court dismissed the case under CR 19 for failure to join an indispensable party: the Tribe. We affirm.
Here are the briefs:
And here is the unpublished opinion in Scott v. Doe.
Briefs:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.