Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
71-1 Motion to File Supplemental Complaint
ADDITIONAL UPDATE (8/27/18):
98 Quechan Opposition to Motion to Strike
105-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint
105-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint
109-1 Rosette Motion to Strike
110-1 Rosette Motion to Dismiss
115-1 Quechan Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Munoz v. Barona Band of Mission Indians (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Alegre v. Zinke (S.D.Cal.):
And here are the materials in the companion case Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Protect Our Communities Foundation v. Black (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in State of California v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):
80 DCT Order Granting US Motion
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court, 16-cv-02622 (N.D. Cali.):
Doc. 9 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss
Doc. 11 Plaintiff’s Memo and Points of Authorities Opposing Defendants’ MTD
Complaint previously posted here.
Here are the materials in Protect Our Communities Foundation v. Black (S.D. Cal.):
34-1 Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians Motion
43 Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians Reply
EWI Protect Our Communities Order Granting Motion for Judgment on Pleadings_3-29-16
An excerpt:
This case concerns the construction of the second phase of an industrial-scale wind farm and the well-being of eagles who nest in or pass through the same general area. More particularly, Plaintiffs, with the noble goal of protecting these eagles, challenge a federal agency’s approval of the project despite its potential to harm eagles. The issue in this case and for these Motions is not whether the agency and those involved in building the wind farm may simply disregard the eagles’ well-being. Harming or killing eagles is a serious offense that subjects offenders to civil fines, criminal fines, and even imprisonment. That is not in dispute. Rather, the question in this case and for these Motions is whether the agency that Plaintiffs sued—BIA—was obligated to take further steps to protect these birds under federal law. Because BIA did not have a legal obligation to proactively ensure that Tule would not violate other federal laws and because, after BIA issued its decision, there was no remaining major federal administrative agency action that would require supplemental environmental analysis, the Court GRANTS Tule’s, the Tribe’s, and BIA’s Motions.
Here is the complaint and exhibits in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (S.D. Cal.):
The tribe’s tribal court complaint against acres begins on page 50 of the pdf above.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.