Here are the materials in Chipmon v. United States (S.D. Miss.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Chipmon v. United States (S.D. Miss.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Magee v. Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation (D. Nev.):
Here are the materials in Gilliam v. Roach (D. Minn.):
Here are the materials in Holtz v. Oneida Airport Hotel Corp. (E.D. Wis.):
Here are new materials in in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
235-1 W&C Amended Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
248 Quechan Response to W&C Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
254-1 Rosette Motion for Sanctions
258 W&C Reply in Support of Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
267 W&C Response to Motion for Sanctions
268 Rosette Reply in Support of Motion for Sanctions
Update (6/24/20):
292-1 W&C Motion for Reconsideration
313 DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
Case tag here.
Here are the materials in Osceola Blackwood Ivory Gaming Group v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians:
Here are the updated materials in Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. Lake County Board of Commissioners (D. Mont.):
89 Lundeen Response to CSKT MSJ
93 Tribe Reply in Support of MSJ
96 CSKT Response to Defs’ MSJs
100 County Reply in Support of MSJ
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Acres Bonusing Inc v. Marston (N.D. Cal.):
29-1 Boutin Jones Defendants MTD
30-1 Boutin Jones Anti-SLAPP Motion
31 Janssen Malloy Defendants Anti-SLAPP Motion
33 Janssen Malloy Defendants MTD
40 JM Defendants Response to 38
45 ABI Response to Marston MTD
46 ABI Reply in Support of Motion for Sanctions
50-1 Marston Anti-SLAPP Motion
52 Marston Response to ABI Motion to Strike
56 ABI Response to BJ Anti-SLAPP Motion
57 ABI Response to JM Anti-SLAPP Motion
58 ABI Response to Marston Anti-SLAPP Motion
59 JM Reply in Support of Anti-SLAPP Motion
60 BJ Reply in Support of Anti-SLAPP Motion
62 Marston Reply in Support of Anti-SLAPP Motion
Related cases here.
Here are the updated materials in JW Gaming Development LLC v. James (N.D. Cal.):
184 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment
191 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment
Prior post here.
Case tag here.
UPDATE (7/7/2020):
220 Individual Tribal Defendants Opposition to 191
221 Plaintiffs Opposition to 210-212
223 Reply in Support of 210-212
UPDATE (1/20/2021)
267 JW Gaming Supplemental Brief
Update (3/28/2021):
286 Motion for Reconsideration
Update (6/8/2021):
333 JW Gaming Motion to Enjoin Tribal Court Case
Here:
Question presented:
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an Administrative Procedure Act action challenging a federal agency’s compliance with statutory requirements governing federal agency decisions, for failure to join a non-federal entity that would benefit from the challenged agency action and cannot be joined without consent.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
You must be logged in to post a comment.