Here are the materials in Temple v. Roberts (D.S.D.):
180-1 Oglala Sioux Tribal Court Decision
Prior post here.

Here are the materials in Temple v. Roberts (D.S.D.):
180-1 Oglala Sioux Tribal Court Decision
Prior post here.

Heather Tanana has published “Voices of the River: The Rise of Indigenous Women Leaders in the Colorado River Basin” in the Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review. Here is the abstract:

Climate change is one of the leading challenges facing tribes today. Traditionally, Indigenous women played significant roles in tribal decision-making and governance. However, European contact and colonization shifted gender dynamics, imposing male-dominated leadership. Recently, Native American women are reclaiming leadership positions—formally within tribal government, as well as informally in prominent community roles. These women are poised to lead the way in protecting their communities against climate change impacts, but support is critical to sustaining pathways to leadership. This article discusses the disproportionate impacts of climate change on tribes and highlights the rise of Indigenous female leadership within the Colorado River Basin to confront these challenges.
KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON IS A STUDY IN GENOCIDAL VILLANY: THE UNITED STATES CONTEMPORARY WAR ON NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES CONTINUES THE RAMPAGES OF THAT ERA.
By what imagined rights does the United States attempt to legitimize its original conquest of Indigenous Peoples and continue to obliterate Native Americans’ Holy Places? In the quest for mineral enrichments–be it oil, copper, lithium, or uranium– how long should we enable and benefit from the sort of genocidal dispossession depicted in Killers of the Flower Moon?
From first contact between Europeans and Indigenous Peoples, dehumanization of American Indians has been the invention necessary to Colonialism. To this end Spain’s monarchs solicited pontifical decrees, “Papal Bulls.” Popes blessed inherently non-Christian subjugations of “heathens, infidels, and savages,” birthing the Doctrine of Discovery, the notion that cross-Atlantic sea travel somehow conveyed title to “America” to European nations. Pope Francis repudiated this indefensible foundation for White Supremacy earlier this year (link), but its legal and cultural legacies live on, perpetuating the inhumane treatment of Indigenous Peoples so poignantly depicted in Killers.
Founding American myths of the righteousness of conquest and of Manifest Destiny both fed and were propagated by the Marshall Trilogy, the suite of Supreme Court opinions (1823 –1832) at the root of U. S. American Indian Law. The first chief justice, John Marshall, wrote that the courts of the conqueror would not apologize for bringing the benefits of “civilization” to America’s Native Nations. Marshall argued that leaving Native Peoples in possession of their lands and resources would condemn America to a forever wilderness and that solving the “Indian problem” required subordination of Native Americans as “wards of the state.”
Continue readingHere are the materials in Sellards-Reck v. Shook (W.D. Wash.):

Here are the relevant materials in United States v. Smith (N.D. Okla.):

You must be logged in to post a comment.