Minnesota Federal Court Dismissed Civil Rights Case against White Earth Nation Police

Here are the materials in Howard v. Weidemann (D. Minn.):

Sklallam Tribes’ Cert Petition over Lummi Nation U&A [U.S. v. Washington subproceeding 11-02]

Here is the petition in Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe v. Lummi Nation:

Question presented:

The question presented is whether the Ninth Circuit—in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts—properly abrogated the long-settled and original understanding of a central treaty term, without any legal or factual basis for doing so, and while redefining the boundary of a major body of water to accommodate its novel treaty interpretation.

Lower court materials here.

Klickitat County v. Yakama Nation Cert Petition

Here is the petition in Klickitat County v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation:

Questions presented:

1. Whether, or in what circumstances, a court may override an Act of Congress adopting a boundary for an Indian reservation, and set its own boundary.

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred by holding-in conflict with the decisions of this Court, including a decision involving the very boundary at issue-that the Reservation encompasses the area at issue.

Lower court materials here.

Klickitat Supplemental Brief

Yakama BIO

Reply

EPA Proposes Withdrawal of Post-McGirt SAFETEA Delegation to Oklahoma

Here are the materials:

Oklahoma Federal Court Denies Oklahoma’s Bid for Injunction on Creek Mining Regulation

Here is the order in State of Oklahoma v. Dept. of the Interior (W.D. Okla.):

Will post the complete briefs later on. Prior post here.

Ninth Circuit Decides Newtok Village v. Patrick

Here.

Briefs here.

Case of Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Community of Sumpango v. Guatemala

From Nicole Friederichs:

Suffolk Law’s Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic secures victory for indigenous communities in Guatemala.

On Friday, December 17, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of indigenous communities in Guatemala in the Case of Maya Kaqchikel indigenous community of Sumpango, et al. v. Guatemala. Suffolk University Law School’s Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic has been the legal representative of the four named indigenous communities in this case since 2012.

The Court ruled that the State of Guatemala violated the indigenous communities’ rights to freedom of expression and thought, culture, and non-discrimination by promoting a regulatory framework which prevented indigenous peoples from accessing radio frequencies to develop and operate community radio stations. The Inter-American Court ordered Guatemala to (1) adopt legislative and regulatory measures to ensure for the recognition of community radio, (2) reserve indigenous community radio as part of the radio spectrum and (3) to halt all government raids of existing indigenous community radio. This court victory culminates decades of advocacy by indigenous communities in Guatemala and indigenous organizations such as Cultural Survival, one of the petitioners in the case.  

What is of particular significance is the Court’s recognition of indigenous peoples’ right to operate their own media, and the relationship of this right to freedom of expression, culture, self-determination, and non-discrimination. This is the first known international case to recognize this right and its recognition by the Inter-American Court should influence how other judicial and human rights bodies interpret and promote this right to media under the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The legal team was led by Nicole Friederichs, Director of Suffolk’s Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples Clinic, along with Suffolk Law Adjunct Prof. Amy Van Zyl-Chavarro. Suffolk Law Prof. Lorie Graham submitted expert testimony, on which the Court relied in its analysis of indigenous peoples’ right to media. Nicole Friederichs noted, “This decision is a victory not only for indigenous communities in Guatemala, but also for indigenous peoples throughout this hemisphere in protecting their rights to freedom of expression and culture and promoting pluralism in media.”

Sentencia_Caso_Pueblos_Indígenas_MayaKaqchikel

Resumen_Sentencia_Pueblos_MayaKaqchikel

Aimée Craft Reviews Fletcher’s “Ghost Road” in Transmotion Journal

Here is the review in PDF and HTML. Transmotion volume 7, issue 2 on Indigeneity and the Anthropocene can be found online here.

Professor Craft’s most recent book, “Treaty Words: For Longs as the Rivers Flow” (Annick Press), can be purchased at Strong Nations and Birchbark Books.

California Federal Court Rejects San Pascual Membership Challenges

Here are the materials in Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.):

176 Plaintiffs MSJ

183 Interior MSJ

186 Plaintiffs Reply

190 Plaintiffs Reply

193 Interior Reply in Support of 183

211 DCT Order re Sanctions

212 DCT Order Granting Interior’s Motion

Prior post here.

CFC Dismisses White Mountain Apache’s Tucker Act Claims re: Open Dumps

Here are the materials in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

66 US Motion to Dismiss

70 Tribe Response

72 Reply

78 CFC Order

Prior post here.