Federal Court Orders Tribal Exhaustion in Title VII Case against Tribal Entity

Here are the materials in Romero v. Wounded Knee LLC (D.S.D.):

56 Motion to Dismiss

59 Motion to Strike

62 Response to 59

63 Reply in Support of 59

67 Response to 56

68 Reply in Support of 56

77 Plaintiff’s Brief on Tribal Exhaustion

78 Defendant’s Brief on Exhaustion

79 DCT Order on Motion to Strike

80 DCT Order on Exhaustion

Federal Court Issues TRO in Grizzly Bear Delisting Case

Here are the materials in Crow Indian Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (D. Mont.):

251 Motion for TRO

252 Organizational Plaintiffs Motion for TRO

253 Brief in Support

254 DCT Order Granting TRO

Prior posts here.

Acres v. Marston Complaint [Blue Lake Rancheria]

Here:

Verified Complaint (conformed)

Federal Court Grants Full Faith and Credit to Wisconsin Oneida Family Court Judgment

Here are the materials in The Chesapeake Life Insurance Co. v. Parker (E.D. Wis.):

13 Defendant_s Motion for Summary J

22 Skenandore Response

23 Parker Response

24 Reply

28 DCT Order Denying MSJ

34 DCT Order

Sixth Circuit Revives One of the Dismissed Claims against BCBS [Medicare Like Rates]

Here is the unpublished opinion in Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. Blue Cross Blue Shield.

A separate unpublished opinion on attorneys fees is here.

Prior posts here.

First Circuit Rejects Narragansett Tribe’s Claims against Rhode Island DOT

Here is the opinion in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Rhode Island Dept. of Transportation.

Briefs:

appellant-brief1.pdf

federal-appellee-brief.pdf

state-appellee-brief.pdf

reply4.pdf

Lower court materials here.

“‘You’ve gotta do it yourself’: Grand Traverse Tribe collects sonar images of Line 5”

From Michigan Radio, here.

Federal Court Rejects HUD Restitution Motion in Ongoing Disputes with Tribal Housing Authorities

Here are the materials in the consolidated matters captioned Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (D. Colo.):

115 HUD Motion for Restitution

120 Housing Authority Opposition

122 Reply

124 DCT Order

An excerpt:

When asked at the hearing why the payments of the judgments were made during the appeal process, counsel for HUD said, “I think they thought it was, you know, the equitable thing to do.” He was right. The equitable thing for the Court to do now is to deny the motion for restitution.

Prior posts here.

Federal Court Orders Jurisdiction-Related Discovery in Title VII Suit against Shiprock Schools

Here are the materials in Jim v. Shiprock Associated Schools (D. N.M.):

6 Motion to Dismiss

11 Response and Motion to Bifurcate

15 Reply

18 DCT Order

North Dakota SCT Issues Tribal Court Jurisdiction Decision

Here is the opinion in Gustafson v. Poitra.

Briefs:

appellant brief

appellee brief