Richard Hughes on Pueblo Water Rights

Richard W. Hughes has published “Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown” in the Natural Resources Journal, Winter 2017.

Here is the abstract:

This article examines the so-far-unsuccessful efforts to judicially define and quantify the water rights appurtenant to the core land holdings of the 19 New Mexico Pueblos, many of whose lands straddle the Rio Grande. It explains that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has squarely held that Pueblo water rights are governed by federal, not state law, and are prior to those of any non-Indian appropriator, but also that the Tenth Circuit acknowledged that it could not say how those rights should be characterized. Part I of the article examines the course of the cases that have sought to achieve this elusive goal. Of the first six cases, filed half a century ago, three ended in negotiated settlements and none of them has yielded a definitive ruling on the nature or measure of Pueblo rights. Of the three cases filed since then, only one is in active litigation on the Pueblo rights issue, but that case may finally lead to a substantive ruling. Part II discusses the few rulings that have been issued in these cases so far relative to Pueblo water rights, and examines the distinctive nature of the issues that are presented by the unique circumstances of the Pueblos’ history and landholdings. The article notes that the ultimate determination of the nature and measure of Pueblo rights could have dramatic consequences for any effort to adjudicate rights on the mainstem of the Upper and Middle Rio Grande.

Navajo Sues Interior over Judiciary Funding

Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. United States (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

Incarcerated Cobell-Eligible Beneficiary’s Federal Trust Claims May Proceed

Here are the materials in Godfrey v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

1 Complaint

8 US Motion to Dismiss

12 Response

15 DCT Order

Gorsuch: “Tribes are . . . Sovereign Nations”

Here is a link to a short clip created by a user on C-SPAN from Judge Gorsuch’s testimony. Judge Gorsuch mentions his decisions in cases involving the Ute Tribe and the Osage Tribe. Thanks to John Dossett.

DAPL Appeal Pleadings

Here are the briefs in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers:

2017 03 15 Em Mtn for Injunction

2017 03 17 ACOE Resp in Opp

2017 03 17 CRST Reply

2017 03 17 DAPL Resp in Opp Exhibits

2017 03 17 DAPL Resp in Opp

2017 03 18 Order Denying Injunction

Central New York Fair Business Assoc. v. Jewell Cert Petition

Here:

Cert Petition

Questions presented:

1) Does the Secretary of the Interior have unlimited authority pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 465,25 U.S.C. § 9 and 43 U.S.C. § 1457 to promulgate and exercise the 25 CFR Part 151 regulations to acquire any fee land from state jurisdiction and place it into federal trust status?
2) Whether the Second Circuit misinterpreted the “fact” discussion in this Court’s majority opinion in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation upholding its prior decision that the Oneida state Indian reservation was federal Indian country affecting the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to acquire 14,000 acres of fee land to place into federal trust in the Records of Decision prejudicing these petitioners in applying 5 U.S.C. § 706 in this case.
3) What is left of the Equal Footing Doctrine if the Secretary of the Interior can acquire fee land from the original colony of the State of New York and place it into federal trust for an Indian tribe to exercise jurisdiction over it as federal territorial land?
Lower court materials here.

Former Tribal Employee’s False Claims Act Suit to Proceed against Individuals, Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Dismissed

Here are the materials in Dahlstrom v. Sauk-Suiattle Tribe (W.D. Wash.):

13 Motion to Dismiss

15 Motion for TRO

19 Response to 15

20 Reply in Support of 15

22 DCT Order Denying 15

27 Response to 13

28 Reply in Support of 13

39 DCT Order on 13

Federal Court Issues Protective Order re: Sacred Sites in Pueblo of Jemez Land Claim against US

Here are the materials in Pueblo of Jemez v. United States (D.N.M.):

105 Pueblo Motion for Protective Order

108 US Response and Cross Motion

110 Pueblo Reply

113 US Reply

114 DCT Order

This case is on remand from the Tenth Circuit, which allowed the Pueblo’s aboriginal title claims to proceed.

More DAPL Pleadings (March 15 to Present)

Here:

174 ACOE Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases

174-1 Proposed Order

175 SRST Motion to Extend Time

176 DAPL Opp to SRST Mtn Ext Time

177 Vance Response to Court’s 3-3-17 Order

[178 sealed]

179 DAPL Status Report-Redacted

180 Stmt of Prop Intervenors as to Adequacy of Representation by Tribes

181 Notice of Lodging Administrative Record

184 ACOE OPP to CRST Mtn PSJ & Cross Mtn for PSJ

185 DAPL Resp to CRST Mtn for Partial SJ & Cross Mtn for Partial SJ

188 ACOE Response to Mtn to Amend Complaint

189 ACOE Response to Jumping Eagle et al Mtns to Intervene

190 DAPL Status Rept

190 Vance Response to Court’s March 13 Order

192 DAPL Opposition to Motions to Intervene

193 DAPL Opposition to Motions to Amend Complaints

Prior post here. All DAPL documents here.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Jamul Action Committee Appeal

Here are the briefs (so far) in Jamul Action Committee v. [Chaudhuri]:

Jamul Action Committee Opening Brief

Federal Answer Brief

Tribe Answer Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.