NYTs: “Black, Native American and Fighting for Recognition in Indian Country”

Here.

WBUR: “Rethinking The Wind River Reservation”

Here.

Federal Court Denies Habeas Petition of Sault Tribe Member Incarcerated for Violating State Cannabis Law

Here are the materials in MacLeod v. Braman (E.D. Mich.):

1 Habeas Petition

19 DCT Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel

20 DCt Order

Michigan COA decision:

Opinion

Ninth Circuit Revives FTCA Claim of Alaska Native Allotment Holder Alleging Trespass and Pollution of the Property

Here is the opinion in Nanouk v. United States.

Briefs:

Nanouk Opening Brief

Reply

Answer Brief

Oklahoma Trial Court Concludes Seminole Nation Reservation Boundaries are Extant Post-McGirt

Here are the materials in State v. Barker (Dist. Ct. Seminole County):

Motion to Dismiss

State Response

District Court Order

Update in Tribal Litigation Involving Gold Coast Shellfish Company [U.S. v. Washington subproceeding 89-3-12]

Here are the materials in United States v. Washington subproceeding 89-3-12 (W.D. Wash.):

1 Skokomish Complaint

142 DCT Order

143 DCT Order — Permanent Injunction

150 Klallam Tribes’ Petition for Review

155 Squaxin and Nisqually Response

157 Gold Coast Response

158 State Response

164 DCT Order

Another Opinion in Pueblo of Jemez Aboriginal Title Claim to Valles Caldera

Here are the new materials in Pueblo of Jemez v. United States (D.N.M.):

409 Motion for Reconsideration

436 US Response

440 Pueblo Reply

461 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Allows Seneca Trespass Action against New York Thruway to Proceed, Allows Interlocutory Appeal

Here are the materials in Seneca Nation v. Cuomo (W.D. N.Y.):

41 Seneca Supplemental Brief

44 New York Supplemental Brief

47 Seneca Supplemental Brief

48 DCT Order

Earlier briefs here.

Fort Berthold Allotment Holders Sue Interior over Mineral Leases

Here are the materials in Fredericks v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

IBIA Decision

Fletcher on Policing and Anishinaabe Political Philosophy

Fletcher’s new working paper is up on SSRN: “Erasing the Thin Blue Line: An Indigenous Proposal.

Here is the abstract:

The article was inspired by the statements of support for the Black Lives Matter movement from state supreme courts like those in Washington and California, and elsewhere. I am a tribal appellate judge for several tribes here in Michigan, and I serve on the Michigan Tribal-State-Judicial Forum. In part, this article is addressed to the state judges who have spoken out on BLM and the judges on the Michigan forum who speak out in favor of Indian children. The novel claim of the article is that the Supreme Court long has used what I term “social contract talk” to demean, dehumanize, and marginalize POC and lower income persons most likely to be subjected to police interventions. This “social contract talk” is not the law, but enables judges to grant police (and prosecutors, though I don’t address them directly) immense discretion to target POC and lower income persons, and to immunize them from legal consequences. Weaponized “social contract talk” recalls the origin of the social contract in America, which enabled and encouraged slavery and dispossession of Indigenous peoples. I offer an alternative to social contract talk rooted in Anishinaabe political philosophy, which encourages inclusion, healing, and accountability. Many tribes have relatively little policing of their territories and a completely different mentality about criminal justice.